Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 121–140 of 171 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Paras Plaza Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 10(4), Kolkata
The assessee, Paras Plaza Pvt. Ltd., filed a return of income on 11.01.2013 declaring a total loss of ₹27,163/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 on 26.03.2019. The assessee filed a re…
Madina Rice Mill Private Limited Vs. ACIT, Central Circle 4(4)
The assessee, Madina Rice Mill Private Limited, filed its return of income on 30.09.2013 declaring a total income of ₹1,45,910/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 24.04.2014. A survey under sectio…
M/s Shroff Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Income Tax Officer
The assessee-company, M/s Shroff Tradelink Pvt. Ltd., filed its original return of income declaring a total income of ₹ 13,160 for the year under consideration. Information was later received from the office of the DDIT (Investigation), Kol…
M/s R.S. Vinimay Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Circle 11(3)
The assessee, M/s R.S. Vinimay Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment year 2016-17 declaring a total income of ₹43,04,040/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the assessment was reopen…
M/s Muse Advertising And Media Private Limited vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-10(3), Kolkata
The assessee, M/s Muse Advertising And Media Private Limited, filed a return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 declaring a total income of Rs.3,750/-. The case was originally assessed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961…
Kakoli Debanshi Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1)
The assessee, Kakoli Debanshi, is a non-filer of return. However, records indicate that she entered into a transaction involving the transfer of capital assets worth ₹40,00,000 and deposited cash amounting to ₹20,34,000 during the year. Con…
ACIT, Circle-4(1), Kolkata vs. Victor Tradelink Pvt. Ltd.
The assessee, Victor Tradelink Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income declaring a total income of Rs.1,75,152/-. The Assessing Officer received information from the Investigation wing indicating that the assessee had received accommodation e…
Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1), Kolkata Vs. Anushreya Investment Private Limited
The assessee, Anushreya Investment Private Limited, filed its return of income on 16-9-2011 declaring an income of Rs. 1,49,290/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under Section 147 of the Act, and a notice was issued on 27-3-2018. The As…
Vinayak Tradevin Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO, Ward-2(1), Kolkata
The assessee-company, Vinayak Tradevin Pvt. Ltd., filed its original return of income for A.Y. 2013–14 on 28.03.2014, declaring a total loss of ₹2,00,002. Subsequently, information was received from the office of the Income Tax Investigatio…
Sumangal Jewels Private Limited vs. DCIT, Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata
The facts in brief are that the search and seizure action as well as survey operation were conducted on 01.12.2025 on Bhalotia Group of Companies as well as residential premises of Director/partners at different places at Raniganj, Asansol,…
Satupur Samabay Unnayan Samity Ltd vs. ITO, Ward-27(3), Haldia
The assessee, Satupur Samabay Unnayan Samity Ltd, did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2018-19. The case was reopened by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on 29.03.2022. In response to the not…
Sarita Goenka vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Sarita Goenka, did not file any return of income for the assessment year 2014-15. The Investigation Wing of the Income Tax Department found that a racket involving accommodation entries in the form of Long Term Capital Gains/S…
Laxmi Gupta vs. ITO Ward 3(2), Darjeeling
The assessee, Laxmi Gupta, filed her return of income on 25.09.2016 declaring a total income of Rs. 2,79,500/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by issuing a notice under section 148 on 12.07.2021. The reo…
Gopal Kundu Roy
The assessee, Gopal Kundu Roy, sold his landed property for Rs.15,00,000/- on 03.09.2013. The stamp duty value of the property was Rs.15,09,374/-. He invested the sale proceeds in the construction of a new house property and claimed exempti…
Essen Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 9(1)
The assessee, Essen Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 14.09.2012, showing total income at ₹nil. The case of the assessee was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Act on 27.03.20…
DCIT, Circle-13(1), Kolkata vs. Century Aluminium MFG Company Ltd.
The assessee, Century Aluminium MFG Company Ltd., filed its return of income for AY 2012-13 declaring a loss of Rs. 3,67,08,876/-. The case was reopened by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on a statement…
Debasis Mukhopadhyay vs. Income Tax Officer
The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the case of the assessee, Debasis Mukhopadhyay, under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by issuing a notice under Section 148 on 26.03.2008, following information that the assessee had booked bogus…
DCIT, Circle-13(2), Kolkata vs. Padma Logistic And Khanij Pvt. Ltd.
The assessee company, Padma Logistic And Khanij Pvt. Ltd., filed its return declaring a total income of Rs.7,18,83,570/- on 24/09/2009 electronically. The return was processed under section 143(1) and the case was selected for a regular ass…
DCIT, Central Circle-4(3), Kolkata Vs Ishana Projects Private Limited
The case involves two appeals filed by the revenue against the orders of the CIT(Appeals), Kolkata, for the assessment years 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. The revenue filed the appeals belatedly by five days each but provided sufficient reasons …
Avishkar Nirman Private Ltd Vs ITO Ward-13(1), Kolkata
This is an appeal filed by Avishkar Nirman Private Ltd against the order of the ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 16.09.2025 for the assessment year 2013-2014. The original assessment under section 143(3) of t…