Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 6180 of 111 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Income Tax Officer, Civic Centre, New Delhi Vs. Sh. Naveen Arora

ITA No.3251/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI7 Jan 2026

The assessee, Sh. Naveen Arora, is engaged in the business of console agents for international freight forwarding under the proprietorship concern Pawansoot Freight Solutions. For the Assessment Year 2017-18, an ex-parte assessment order wa

Read summary

Horizon HGE Electronic Equipment India Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT

ITA No.2695/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi 'B' Bench, New Delhi16 Jan 2026

The assessee, Horizon HGE Electronic Equipment India Pvt. Ltd., is a company that derived income from business and filed its return of income on 14.10.2020, declaring a total income of INR 2,42,00,780/- and paid taxes at the concessional ra

Read summary

Harshish Singh Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-28(8), New Delhi

ITA No.6388/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, ‘E’: New Delhi19 Jan 2026

The appellant assessee, Harshish Singh, derived income from the sale and purchase of diamonds and jewellery during the Assessment Year 2017-18. He filed his Return of Income on 17.11.2017 declaring a total income of Rs.12,04,630/- under sec

Read summary

Hansraj Vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No:- 4978/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH: ‘C’: NEW DELHI)30 Jan 2026

In this case, the assessee, Hansraj, had not filed his return of income for the assessment year 2014-15. The Department found that the assessee had deposited a large sum of cash in his bank account during the financial year 2013-14. The Ass

Read summary

GAURAV BHATIA, VS. ITO, WARD 70(5), C-9, WESTERN COLONY, NEW DELHI

ITA No. 5531/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ : NEW DELHI)22 Jan 2026

The assessee, Gaurav Bhatia, an individual, filed a return declaring total income of Rs. 2,73,320/- under the head ‘salary’ and ‘other sources’ for the assessment year 2017-18. The case was selected for Complete Scrutiny under CASS due to '

Read summary

Gandaram & Sons Jewellers Pvt Ltd Vs. The A.C.I.T.

ITA No. 3754/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi ‘F’ Bench16 Jan 2026

The assessee, Gandaram & Sons Jewellers Pvt Ltd, filed its return of income for the year 2017-18 declaring a total income of Rs. 42,56,460/-. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing

Read summary

DCIT, Noida Vs. Pearl Precision Products Pvt. Ltd

ITA No. 2278/Del/2023INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘A’9 Jan 2026

The case pertains to the assessment year 2020-21. Pearl Precision Products Pvt. Ltd, a company involved in manufacturing various household accessories, filed its return of income declaring a total income of ₹21,65,37,670/-. During a survey

Read summary

C.R. Investments Vs. ACIT, Circle-28(1), Delhi

ITA No.900/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench: ‘E’ New Delhi22 Jan 2026

The case pertains to the assessment year 2018-19, where the assessee, C.R. Investments, appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [CIT(A)/NFAC], Delhi. The CIT(A)/NFAC had upheld

Read summary

ACIT, Circle 34 (1), vs. Vishakha Builders LLP

ITA No.693/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCHES ‘C’: NEW DELHI14 Jan 2026

The assessee, Vishakha Builders LLP, filed its return of income declaring a total income of Rs.17,52,270/- for the assessment year 2022-23. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS, primarily to verify large deductions claimed under Ch

Read summary

Rajeev Kejriwal Vs. I.T.O., Ward-33(1), Kolkata

ITA No.: 2981/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA28 Jan 2026

The assessee, Rajeev Kejriwal, an individual, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 showing a total income of ₹17,80,400/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under the Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection (CASS) and th

Read summary

H R Infracon Limited Vs. DCIT, Circle-7(1), Kolkata

ITA No.: 2835/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA30 Jan 2026

The assessee, H R Infracon Limited, filed a return of income for AY 2022-23 declaring a loss of ₹2,56,182/-. The case was selected for scrutiny due to high liabilities compared to low income/receipts and large turnover with unaudited books

Read summary

AVR Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Ward-14(1), Kolkata

ITA No.2596/KOL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Kolkata12 Jan 2026

The assessee, AVR Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd., is a Private Limited Company engaged in trading and hotel operations. It filed its return of income for A.Y. 2018–19 declaring a total income of ₹9,40,973. The case was selected for scrutiny, an

Read summary

Tanuj Pahilaj Lalwani vs Income Tax Officer Ward 27(3)(1)

I.T.A No.7340/Mum/2025, I.T.A. No.7558/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench ‘E’, Mumbai13 Jan 2026

The assessee, Tanuj Pahilaj Lalwani, is a non-filer of income-tax returns. He, along with his father, purchased a flat for Rs.1.50 crore on 08.09.2017. The case was reopened based on information from the Sub-Registrar, Mumbai. The assessee

Read summary

Sukir Ladaku Naik Vs ITO, 28(3)(1), Mumbai

ITA No. 5912/MUM/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SMC BENCH, MUMBAI6 Jan 2026

The assessee, Sukir Ladaku Naik, is an individual and proprietor of Sanjay Country Bar, engaged in the business of selling Indian-made liquor. All sales during the relevant financial year were in cash, which were deposited in bank accounts

Read summary

M/s. R.M. Bhuther and Co. Vs. National Faceless Appeal Centre

ITA No.7294/Mum/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI23 Jan 2026

The assessee, M/s. R.M. Bhuther and Co., a partnership firm, filed its original return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring total income at Rs.Nil. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Th

Read summary

Manisha Kamalkar Sadavarte vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 3729/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “H(SMC)” Bench1 Jan 2026

The case pertains to the assessment year 2017-18 where the Assessing Officer (AO) brought to tax a sum of Rs. 10,05,000/- as unexplained money under section 69A read with section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of cash deposi

Read summary

Manisha Devnani Vs. INT Tax Ward 2(1)(1)

ITA No. 344/MUM/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench23 Jan 2026

This appeal was filed by Manisha Devnani against the assessment order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the Income-tax Officer (International Taxation), Ward 1(1), Mumbai, under section 147 read with section 144C(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, fo

Read summary

Javed Munir Khan Vs. ITO 26(1)(4)

ITA No. 5428/MUM/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench ‘F’13 Jan 2026

The case involves Javed Munir Khan, who deposited aggregate cash amounting to ₹1,13,28,200 during the demonetization period and ₹92,64,140 during the post-demonetization period. The Assessing Officer treated the deposits as unexplained mone

Read summary

Income Tax Officer vs. Antara Tushar Motiwala

ITA No. 3662/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench Mumbai22 Jan 2026

The assessee, Antara Tushar Motiwala, filed her return of income for A.Y. 2017–18 declaring a total income of Rs. 19,05,920/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny due to a large increase in capital. The Assessing Officer noticed a su

Read summary

Bina Ghosh vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 5877/MUM/2025 & ITA No. 5878/MUM/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH, MUMBAI19 Jan 2026

The assessee, Bina Ghosh, did not file an income tax return for the financial year relevant to Assessment Year 2016-17 as she had no taxable income. Her husband purchased a residential property, and her name was included in the sale deed. T

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning