Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 41–60 of 61 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
ITA No. 6174/MUM/2025
The assessee, Bhavin Kumar Rameshkumar Jain, filed his return of income electronically on 08.08.2019, declaring a gross total income of ₹36,29,172/- and total taxable income of ₹29,17,550/-. Subsequently, a search and seizure action under s…
ITA No.7390/Mum/2025
The assessee, Sunjewels Private Limited, is a resident corporate entity engaged in the business of manufacturing gold and diamond studded jewellery for export. For the assessment year 2016-17, the assessee filed its return of income declari…
Parsan Brothers Vs. DCIT, Circle-36, Kolkata
The assessee, Parsan Brothers, is engaged in the wholesale business of bonded goods. The original return of income for A.Y. 2013-14 was filed showing a total income of ₹55,75,830/-. The initial assessment was made under section 143(3) of th…
Ranjit Kumar Modi
The assessee, Ranjit Kumar Modi, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2013-2014 declaring a total income of Rs.4,74,110/-. Information received from AIIMS data revealed that the assessee had availed a bogus entry of long-term …
Rajpal Gupta
The assessee, Rajpal Gupta, filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2019-20 declaring taxable income at Rs.6,32,140/-. The Directorate of Income Tax (Inv.), Kolkata conducted an inquiry based on inputs from the CGST authority and…
Pravesh Kumar Jaiswal Vs ITO, Ward-62(1), Kolkata
The case of the assessee, Pravesh Kumar Jaiswal, was selected for scrutiny as it was noticed that he had made substantial purchases from certain suppliers who were either non-filers of income tax returns, filed returns with abnormally low t…
Kamlawati Chowhan vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee, Kamlawati Chowhan, filed a return of income for the assessment year 2018-19 declaring a total income of ₹ 5,48,560/-. The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on info…
DCIT, Central Circle-4(4), Kolkata vs. M/s EvernewCommodeal Pvt. Ltd.
The case involves appeals by the assessee, M/s EvernewCommodeal Pvt. Ltd., against orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20. The assessee had declared a total income of Rs. 10,02…
Ishwar Prasad Jaiswal Vs ITO Ward-37(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Ishwar Prasad Jaiswal, filed a return of income for the Assessment Year 2018-19 declaring a total income of Rs. 2,49,390/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information that the assessee was a beneficiary of bogus transacti…
ITO, Ward-29(1), Kolkata vs. Puspa Kothari, L/H of Sunder Lal Kothari
The assessee, Sunder Lal Kothari, filed a return of income for A.Y. 2013-14 claiming long-term capital gain of Rs.11,87,710/- as exempt income under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. During the assessment proceedings, it was revealed th…
Vinod Bhandari vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The present appeal filed by Vinod Bhandari arises from an order dated 24.01.2025 passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata. The issue raised by the assessee is against …
Singh Construction Corporation Vs. DCIT, Central Circle -2
The case of the assessee, Singh Construction Corporation, was selected for limited scrutiny for verification of genuineness of expenses (large payment made u/s 194C) to persons who had not filed the return of income. The assessee submitted …
Palak Alloys Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle 3(1)
The Income Tax Assessing Officer (AO) noted that Palak Alloys Pvt. Ltd. was a beneficiary of accommodation entries from M/s Ultra Trade Mart. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act and a notice under section 148 was issued on 29…
Narayan Das Damani vs. ITO, Ward-44(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Narayan Das Damani, runs a proprietary concern named M/s Oriental Industries, dealing in wires and cables. For the year ended 31.03.2019, he submitted a return of income showing a total income of 368,070, which was accepted un…
Jaydip Dhar vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Jaydip Dhar, filed a return of income on 31.03.2017 declaring a total income of Rs. 3,03,720/-. His case was selected for limited scrutiny due to large cash deposits into his bank account. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued not…
M/s. Sanjay Enterprises Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Raichur
The assessee, M/s. Sanjay Enterprises, had not filed its return of income. Based on information available in the AIMS module of the ITBA, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee had deposited cash of Rs. 7,10,000/- in the savings…
Hitesh Rohilla Vs ACIT
The assessee, Hitesh Rohilla, filed his return of income for AY 2013-14 declaring a total income of Rs. 2,18,060/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information from the investigation wing indicating that during a search and seizure oper…
GSS Pizza Circle Pvt. Ltd. Vs. NFAC
This appeal arises against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [CIT(A)/NFAC], Delhi, dated 14.05.2025, involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The case was ca…
Shashi Kant Chaurasia Vs. DCIT
The assessee, Shashi Kant Chaurasia, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2018-19 declaring income of Rs.149,47,78,770, which included long-term capital gains (LTCG) of Rs.144,46,86,075 from the sale of cut and polished diamon…
Ambuja Neotia Hotel Ventures Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle 8(1)
During the assessment year 2014-15, the assessee, Ambuja Neotia Hotel Ventures Ltd., earned exempt income of Rs.3,929/- by way of dividend income. The assessee suo moto disallowed Rs.13,355/- as expenditure incurred in relation to earning o…