Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 4160 of 85 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Mukesh Kumar Vs National Faceless Appeal Centre

ITA No.5441/DEL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH, ‘E’: NEW DELHI19 Jan 2026

The appellant assessee, Mukesh Kumar, is an individual who was in the business of running cabs. He filed his Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2012-13 on 18.04.2013, declaring an income of Rs.9,20,934/-. The learned Assessing Officer

Read summary

Machining & Forging Vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 5753/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘G’: New Delhi28 Jan 2026

The instant appeal is preferred by the assessee, Machining & Forging, against the order dated 23.07.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. This order arose out of the order dated 16.03.2022 passed by the Assessing

Read summary

Late Shri Duleechanda Vs. The I.T.O

ITA No. 1353/DEL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘C’ BENCH16 Jan 2026

The case pertains to an appeal by the assessee, Late Shri Duleechanda, against the order of the NFAC, Delhi dated 04.12.2024 for A.Y 2010-11. The assessee filed an application for condonation of delay due to ill health, which was accepted b

Read summary

Lalit Kumar vs ITO Gurugram

ITA No. 6304/DEL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI14 Jan 2026

The assessee, Shri Lalit Kumar, an agriculturist, did not file his return for Assessment Year 2015-16. Based on information from the department's insight portal regarding cash deposits in his bank account, a notice under section 148 was iss

Read summary

Kanchan Rawal Vs. Income Tax Officer/ National Faceless Assessment Order Centre, JAO:ITO, Ward-36(1) New Delhi

ITA No.9010/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH22 Jan 2026

The case pertains to the assessment year 2019-20. The appellant, Kanchan Rawal, filed an appeal against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [CIT(A)/NFAC], Delhi’s DIN & Order No:ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1

Read summary

Gaurav Dhir Vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No.8812/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench27 Jan 2026

This appeal pertains to the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee, Gaurav Dhir, has appealed against the order of the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], Nashik, dated 31.10.2025. The case involves proceedings un

Read summary

ITA No. 234/Del/2025 CO 228/Del/2025 Ashutosh Foods (AY: 2015-16)

ITA No. 234/Del/2025 CO 228/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'A' BENCH, DELHI14 Jan 2026

The assessee, Ashutosh Foods, filed a return of income on 01.10.2015 declaring income at Rs.56,95,570/- for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessment order was passed on 29.12.2017 at the same income. Subsequently, a notice u/s 148 was is

Read summary

Dashmesh Educational Charitable Trust (AY: 2015-16)

ITA No.4497/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'B' BENCH, DELHI23 Jan 2026

This appeal is preferred by the assessee, Dashmesh Educational Charitable Trust, against the order dated 13.06.2025 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC), which dismissed the appeal primarily due to the non-appearance of the

Read summary

Ankur Ramesh Vahi vs. ITO

ITA No.7535/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘E’23 Jan 2026

This appeal is filed by the Assessee, Ankur Ramesh Vahi, against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi, dated 3.10.2025, in appeal No. NFAC/2016-17/10514292 for Assessmen

Read summary

Natungram Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Limited Vs. ITO, Ward-42(1), Murshidabad

ITA No.: 905/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA27 Jan 2026

The assessee, Natungram Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Limited, a Primary Agricultural Credit Society, filed a return of income showing ‘NIL’ income after claiming a deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to ₹36,4

Read summary

H R Infracon Limited Vs. DCIT, Circle-7(1), Kolkata

ITA No.: 2835/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA30 Jan 2026

The assessee, H R Infracon Limited, filed a return of income for AY 2022-23 declaring a loss of ₹2,56,182/-. The case was selected for scrutiny due to high liabilities compared to low income/receipts and large turnover with unaudited books

Read summary

Bengal Distribution House vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Malda

ITA No.2103/Kol/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Kolkata21 Jan 2026

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee, Bengal Distribution House, for the assessment year 2017-18 against the order dated 31.07.2025 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] passed under s

Read summary

Wandel Global Services Pvt. Ltd. (Struck off) vs. ITO, Ward-15(3)(1)

I.T.A. No.5874/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), 'SMC' Bench, Mumbai27 Jan 2026

The assessee-company, Wandel Global Services Pvt. Ltd., did not file its return for the Assessment Year 2013-14. However, it was revealed that the company had deposited Rs. 3,50,000 in cash in Karnataka Bank. The case was reopened under sec

Read summary

Shri Deepak Devidas Sajnani v/s The Income Tax Officer (International Taxation), Ward – 4(2)(1), Mumbai

ITA No.1761/MUM/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI9 Jan 2026

The assessee, Shri Deepak Devidas Sajnani, purchased an immovable property for Rs.2,43,44,840/- during the assessment year 2015-16. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a notice under section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, suspecting tha

Read summary

Rattan Jodharam Harchwani v/s. Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2(2)

ITA No.5771/MUM/2025INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI13 Jan 2026

The Assessing Officer received information that the assessee had deposited cash of Rs 4.36 cr. in his bank account with Konark Urban Coop. Bank, Ulhasnagar from 07.11.2013 to 20.04.2015. No return of income was filed. Based on search and se

Read summary

Rajani Shivaji Ghadge vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 7020/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “D” Bench12 Jan 2026

The assessment in this case was completed under sections 147, 144, and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) brought to tax an amount of Rs. 51,48,592/- on account of the sale of immovable property as Short Term Capit

Read summary

Bina Ghosh vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 5877/MUM/2025 & ITA No. 5878/MUM/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH, MUMBAI19 Jan 2026

The assessee, Bina Ghosh, did not file an income tax return for the financial year relevant to Assessment Year 2016-17 as she had no taxable income. Her husband purchased a residential property, and her name was included in the sale deed. T

Read summary

Apurva Mukesh Thakkar Vs. ITO Ward 41(2)(1) Mumbai

ITA No. 6367/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench Mumbai22 Jan 2026

The assessee, Apurva Mukesh Thakkar, is an individual who was carrying on business as a proprietor of M/s Bhavana Televentures during the relevant previous year. He did not file a return of income under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act,

Read summary

Sanjay De

ITA No. 1791/KOL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ Bench, Kolkata30 Oct 2025

The assessee, Sanjay De, an individual engaged in promoting and development business, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 declaring a total income of Rs.21,51,710/-. The assessing officer issued notices under sections

Read summary

Riteshh Agarwal vs. ITO, NFAC, Delhi

I.T.A. No.826/Kol/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA27 Oct 2025

The assessee, Riteshh Agarwal, filed his return of income on 02.07.2018 declaring a total income of Rs. 15,47,510/-. The case was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Subsequently, the case was reopened under section

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning