Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 41–48 of 48 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Arabinda Paul Vs. PCIT, Kolkata
The assessee, Arabinda Paul, filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 on 06.11.2017, declaring a total income of ₹4,87,850/-. His case was selected for limited scrutiny to verify cash deposits during the financial year. Th…
V Hotels Limited Versus The National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi & Ors.
The Petitioner, V Hotels Limited, is challenging the notices issued by the Respondents under Sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2024-25. The Petitioner contends that prior to the initiation of the…
Rajesh Kumar Dalmia Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Rajesh Kumar Dalmia, filed his return of income for A.Y. 2017-18 declaring income of ₹6,08,660/-. His case was selected for scrutiny due to an abnormal increase in cash deposits during the demonetization period (09/11/2016 to …
M/s Subhrashi Enclave Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-10(2), Kolkata
The assessee, M/s Subhrashi Enclave Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 declaring a total income of Rs.2,530/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny due to specific issues such as low income compared …
Ebay Singapore Services Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
The assessee, eBay Singapore Services Private Limited, is a non-resident company incorporated in Singapore in 2003. It provides e-commerce-related services to its group companies and has been a resident of Singapore, obtaining Tax Residency…
MANNOHAR LAL HIRA LAL LTD. VS. ITO, WARD 2(1)(4)
This appeal by the assessee, MANNOHAR LAL HIRA LAL LTD., emanates from the order of the NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1044561646(1) dated 08.08.2022 relating to assessment year 2017-18. The assessee filed grounds of appe…
Ramasamy Kandasamy v. The ITO
The case involves the reopening of an assessment for the Assessment Year 2012-13 by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant, Ramasamy Kandasamy, is one of the trustees of 'The Karur Kongu Char…
Sri.Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith vs. The Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Sri.Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith, is a wholesale and retail distributor of Cadbury products in North Bangalore. For the assessment year 2017-18, he declared a taxable income of Rs.10,06,240/-. His income comprised a l…