Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 21–37 of 37 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Balaram Nama Gaikwad vs IIO, Ward – 3(1), Kalyan
These two appeals by assessee, Balaram Nama Gaikwad, are directed against the separate orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] both dated 26.06.2025 for Assessment years (AY) 2014-15 & 2016-17 respectively. The a…
Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited vs. Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi
The appeal was filed by Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited against the order dated 31/03/2025 passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee challenged the reopen…
Shree Capital Services Ltd. Vs. A.C.I.T., Circle-5(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Shree Capital Services Ltd., is a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) engaged in providing loans and making investments in shares and securities. The assessee filed its return of income computing total income at ₹116,67,19,27…
Sandhya Saha
The assessee, Sandhya Saha, an individual, did not file her return of income for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. It was noticed that she had made cash deposits in her bank account amounting to Rs.20,99,414/- for AY 2013-14 and Rs.…
Sanjay Kumar Gupta Vs. ACIT
A search under section 132 of the Income Tax Act was conducted on Sanjay Kumar Gupta on 05.11.2020, resulting in the seizure of cash amounting to ₹1,35,29,300/-. The assessee is engaged in the transportation business and has been filing ret…
M/s. Sanjay Enterprises Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Raichur
The assessee, M/s. Sanjay Enterprises, had not filed its return of income. Based on information available in the AIMS module of the ITBA, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee had deposited cash of Rs. 7,10,000/- in the savings…
Harish Bansal vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 36(4), New Delhi
The assessee, Harish Bansal, filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 on 30.10.2017 declaring an income of Rs.8,21,830/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and a notice under section 143(2) dated 16.8.2018 was issued. Fur…
Kreuz Subsea Technologies Pte. Ltd. Vs. ACIT
Kreuz Subsea Technologies Pte. Ltd. filed an appeal against the final assessment order dated 26/03/2021 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation 2(1)(2)-Delhi under Section 143(3) read with Section 1…
Ashok Parshad Gupta vs. DCIT, Central Circle 20
The assessee, Ashok Parshad Gupta, is engaged in the business of chemicals. A search and seizure operation was conducted by the Investigation Wing on 01.12.2018 in Faquir Chand Lockers and Vaults Pvt. Ltd. group of cases, where the assessee…
Kishan Lal Vs. The NFAC
The assessee, Kishan Lal, was robbed on the highway and an addition of Rs 50,00,000 was made on account of alleged unexplained cash. The robbers were caught with Rs 30,38,000, and they admitted having looted Rs 50,00,000. Kishan Lal verifie…
Indane Bottling Plant Loading and Unloading, Labour Co-operative Society Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The present appeal arises from an order under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) at the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, dated 24.02.2025. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed…
Shashi Kant Chaurasia Vs. DCIT
The assessee, Shashi Kant Chaurasia, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2018-19 declaring income of Rs.149,47,78,770, which included long-term capital gains (LTCG) of Rs.144,46,86,075 from the sale of cut and polished diamon…
Tajpur S.K.U.S Ltd. Vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru
The assessee, Tajpur S.K.U.S Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi, which was passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2018-19. The appeal wa…
Maruti Multichem Pvt. Ltd. vs. The DCIT
The assessee, Maruti Multichem Pvt. Ltd., filed its Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring a total income of Rs. 1,79,06,740/-. The case was reopened on the basis that the assessee had received bogus loans and advances f…
Om Trading Co. Vs. NFAC Delhi
The assessee, Om Trading Co., a partnership firm, did not file its return of income for the assessment year 2019-20. The department found that the assessee had deposited cash of Rs.2,76,95,000/- in its bank account and withdrawn cash of Rs.…
M/s. Nihal Projects Vs. ITO
The assessee, M/s. Nihal Projects, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 on 03.11.2017, declaring a total taxable income of Rs. 3,28,650/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and notices under section 143(2) of the Inc…
Sri.Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith vs. The Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Sri.Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith, is a wholesale and retail distributor of Cadbury products in North Bangalore. For the assessment year 2017-18, he declared a taxable income of Rs.10,06,240/-. His income comprised a l…