Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 2140 of 171 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Nagpal vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 179/Del/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'SMC', New Delhi10 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

The assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2018-19 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi's order dated 16.02.2024. The delay of 617 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The main issue is the validity of section 148 proceedings where the As

Read summary

Sanjay Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

आअसं.7038/धिल्ली /2025(नि.व. 2018-19)Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'C'10 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

The assessee, Sanjay Kumar, started a small business of sale of confectionery items. He filed his return of income for AY 2016-17 u/s.44AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 declaring total income of Rs.2,77,560/-. For the next two assessment year

Read summary

Sh. Sahil Garg v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43(3), Delhi

ITA No.76/Del/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench9 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083737185(1), date

Read summary

M/s. Srigarv Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT

ITA No.190/Del/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench9 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2020-21 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30 [in short, the “CIT(A)”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/M/250/2025-26/1083280318(1), dated 03.12.2025 involving proceedings un

Read summary

Sh. Ankit Agarwal vs. Income Tax Officer, Noida

ITA No.2/Del/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench9 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2015-16 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082184649(1), dated

Read summary

Kuldip Kumar Goel vs. ACIT (1)(1)

ITA No.3285/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'E', New Delhi6 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The appellant, Kuldip Kumar Goel, an individual, filed an original Income Tax Return for A.Y. 2012-13 declaring income of Rs. 30,85,160/-. The assessment under section 143(3) of the Act was completed on 17.03.2015 by accepting the return in

Read summary

Krishan Kumar Bhatnagar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1)(3), Ghaziabad

ITA No.2585/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B', Delhi6 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

The assessee is an individual fetching income from house property, profession, and other sources. The proceeding for assessment year 2016-17 was initiated under section 148 due to cash payment for the purchase of immovable property. The Ass

Read summary

M/s Khemka Stuart Leisure Ltd. vs ACIT

ITA No. 2360/Del/2015Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi5 Feb 2026AY 2005-06

The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2005-06 arises against the CIT(A)-XXVII, New Delhi’s dated 27.11.2014, in case No. 407/13-14/CIT(A)-XXVII/2014-15, in proceedings u/s 143(3)/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee seeks to re

Read summary

Vardhman International v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

ITA No. 5771 & 5772/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘G’4 Feb 2026AY 2015-16, 2016-17

The appeals are filed by the assessee against the orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals/ National Faceless Appeal Centre), New Delhi dated 21/01/2025 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 & 2016-17. There is a delay of 171 days in

Read summary

RMP Holdings Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No.4592/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B'4 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The assessee filed its return of income declaring total income on 13.09.2012 and the assessment order was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 03.03.2015 at a total income of Rs 2,02,040/-. Thereafter, reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were

Read summary

Shamim Ahmad Vs The I.T.O

ITA No. 4241/DEL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi ‘G’ Bench4 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The assessee, Shamim Ahmad, is engaged in the trading of livestock. He filed his return of income on 25.07.2012 declaring an income of Rs. 4,99,507/-. The case was reopened vide notice u/s 148 dated 28.03.2019 and completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s

Read summary

Income Tax Officer, Panipat vs. Smt. Rajni Chopra

ITA No.8572/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench2 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

The Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082622847(1), dated 1

Read summary

Ranjeet Singh Vs. ITO, Ward-5(5), Patna

I.T.A. No.: 304/PAT/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench at Kolkata17 Mar 2025

The assessee, Ranjeet Singh, deposited Rs. 30,50,000 in his IDBI Bank account during the relevant year, with Rs. 14,50,000 deposited during demonetization and Rs. 16,00,000 deposited in the rest of the year. The source of the deposits was c

Read summary

M/s Keynesian Financial Services Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle-7(1)

ITA No.2264/KOL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'C' Bench, Kolkata28 Mar 2025

The assessee, M/s Keynesian Financial Services Ltd., filed its return of income on 21.09.2013, declaring a total income of ₹ 84,930/-. The assessee was engaged in financing and dealing in shares and securities. The case was reopened under s

Read summary

Vishnu Purohit Vs. ITO, Ward-61(1), Kolkata

I.T.A. No. 630/Kol/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), 'A' Bench, Kolkata26 Mar 2025

The assessee, Vishnu Purohit, an individual, did not file his return of income for the assessment year 2016-17 as his income was below the taxable limit. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the case based on information from the In

Read summary

Navrartan Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-6(3), Kolkata

ITA Nos. 781 to 784/KOL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench Kolkata25 Mar 2025

The appeals were filed by Navrartan Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. against the orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. The assessee company was incorporated on 16.07.2009 and was struck off

Read summary

Ajay Kumar Chiripal Vs ITO, Ward-43(1), Kolkata

ITA No. 1406/KOL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, KOLKATA24 Mar 2025

The assessee, Ajay Kumar Chiripal, a stock broker registered with the Calcutta Stock Exchange, filed his original return under section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 19.09.2017. Subsequently, a notice under section 148 of the Act was

Read summary

Birendra Nath Saha Vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Malda

I.T.A. Nos. 1771 & 1772/Kol/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) 'B' Bench, Kolkata17 Mar 2025

The assessee, Birendra Nath Saha, filed his return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 16,68,790/-. The case was reopened as information indicated that the assessee had a turnover of Rs. 36,48,32,670/- for FY 2013-14, but the accounts

Read summary

Income Tax Officer, Ward -12(1) Vs. Vasa Commercial Pvt. ltd.

ITA No.1675/KOL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ C” BENCH, KOLKATA17 Mar 2025

The assessee, Vasa Commercial Pvt. ltd., filed the return of income on 24.09.2015, declaring a total income of ₹78,09,700/-. The case was reopened u/s 147 of the Act by issuing a notice u/s 148 of the Act on 31.03.2021. The Assessing Office

Read summary

ITA No.1615/KOL/2024

1615/KOL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ B” BENCH, KOLKATA17 Mar 2025

The assessee, Sawansukha Jewellers Private Limited, filed its return of income on 30.10.2018 declaring a total income of ₹29,74,75,300/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and the assessment was framed under section 143(3) of the Act, asse

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning