Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 21–40 of 48 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Hanuman Agro Industries Vs DCIT, Circle-4(1), Kolkata
This is an appeal filed by Hanuman Agro Industries against the order dated 22.05.2025, passed by the ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the assessment year 2018-2019. The assessee originally filed its return of inc…
Dhananjoy Das Adhikari Vs ITO Ward-27(2), Haldia
The assessee, Dhananjoy Das Adhikari, is a retired Principal of Palpara College, Midnapore, who retired in 2004. He is suffering from dementia and is bedridden. The assessee had a habit of withdrawing his pension from one bank account and d…
ABC India Limited Vs. DCIT, Circle 11(1)
The assessee, ABC India Limited, filed a return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 declaring total income at nil. The case was selected for scrutiny, and notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act were issued and …
Nirman Realtors and Developers Ltd. vs. Circle-2(3)(1)
The assessee, Nirman Realtors and Developers Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment year 2012-13 declaring a total income of Rs. 1,08,15,970/-. The case was selected for scrutiny assessment, and a notice under section 143(2) of…
Avance Technologies Limited Vs ACIT, Central Circle – 2(2), Mumbai
The assessee company, Avance Technologies Limited, filed its return of income for A.Y. 2017-18 declaring income of Rs. 17,43,210/-. The case was selected for complete scrutiny. The assessing officer noted that the assessee-company is part o…
Rajroop Doshi Vs. ITO Ward 2(1)
The assessee, Rajroop Doshi, filed a return of income which was revised on 27.03.2018, declaring a total income of ₹47,89,100/-. The case was selected for scrutiny through Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection (CASS) for examination of certa…
Sanjay De
The assessee, Sanjay De, an individual engaged in promoting and development business, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 declaring a total income of Rs.21,51,710/-. The assessing officer issued notices under sections…
Riteshh Agarwal vs. ITO, NFAC, Delhi
The assessee, Riteshh Agarwal, filed his return of income on 02.07.2018 declaring a total income of Rs. 15,47,510/-. The case was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Subsequently, the case was reopened under section …
Rajesh Agarwal vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Rajesh Agarwal, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 declaring a total income of ₹10,20,410/-. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was selected for scrutiny…
M/s Parama Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 2(3)
The assessee, M/s Parama Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 16.03.2012 declaring a total income of ₹77,360/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 on 30.03.2016. The ass…
Chhanda Kar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-27(3), Haldia
Chhanda Kar, a retailer of SARI and other ladies' garments, was assessed to tax under the jurisdiction of the Income Tax Officer, Ward 27(3), Haldia. The assessment year 2015-16 was completed and an order was passed under sections 147, 144,…
Response Renewable Energy Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-4(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Response Renewable Energy Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 declaring a total income of ₹84,770 and book profit under section 115JB of ₹82,667. The case was selected for scrutiny, and notices und…
Raju Mandol Vs. ITO, Ward-43(3), Kolkata
The assessee, Raju Mandol, is an individual who filed his return of income showing a total income of ₹40,120/- as income from business. The Revenue had information that the assessee was the proprietor of M/s. Shree Ganesh Enterprises and ha…
Narayan Dalmia
The appellant-assessee, Narayan Dalmia, filed his return of income on 06.10.2018 declaring a total income of Rs.20,60,150/-. The case was selected under ‘Compulsory criteria’ and a notice under section 143(2) of the Act was issued and serve…
Kadambini Chaudhry
The appellant-assessee filed her return of income on 31.08.2015 declaring total income at ‘NIL’. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS. Notices under Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act were issued and served upon the as…
Vinayak Tradevin Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO, Ward-2(1), Kolkata
The assessee-company, Vinayak Tradevin Pvt. Ltd., filed its original return of income for A.Y. 2013–14 on 28.03.2014, declaring a total loss of ₹2,00,002. Subsequently, information was received from the office of the Income Tax Investigatio…
Debasis Mukhopadhyay vs. Income Tax Officer
The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the case of the assessee, Debasis Mukhopadhyay, under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by issuing a notice under Section 148 on 26.03.2008, following information that the assessee had booked bogus…
Albatross Investment Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward 3(1)
The assessee, Albatross Investment Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income under section 139(1) of the Act on 28.09.2013, declaring a total income of ₹19,250/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under sect…
Krishna Gopal Saraf Vs. The A.C.I.T
The assessee, Krishna Gopal Saraf, filed his return of income for AY 2013-14 declaring an income of Rs 7,12,630/-. A search and seizure action was carried out on 07.03.2014 under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in which various doc…
M/s Merino Industries Ltd vs DCIT, Circle-12(1), Kolkata
M/s Merino Industries Ltd, a private limited company, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2014-15 declaring a total income of Rs.36,06,90,830/-. The company had received a loan of Rs.39,34,10,000/- from its subsidiary, M/s Me…