Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 221–230 of 230 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
ACIT, Circle 25 (1) vs. Vipul Limited
The assessee, Vipul Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2007-08 declaring an income of Rs.67,58,29,846/-. Subsequently, the assessee revised its return declaring a total income of Rs.71,13,29,746/-. The assessment was co…
Jagbir Singh vs ITO
The assessee, Jagbir Singh, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 electronically on 07.07.2011, which was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information from …
Parvinder Kaur Sawhney vs. Pr.CIT, Delhi – 12
The assessee, Parvinder Kaur Sawhney, did not file an income tax return for the Assessment Year 2011-12. A notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was issued, but the assessee did not respond. Consequently, the assessment was c…
Neena Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT(OSD), Ward-1(2)
The assessee, Neena Commercial Pvt. Ltd., filed a return of income on 29.09.2010. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information from the Director of Income Tax (Investigation) indicating that large cash deposits were made in ICICI Bank br…
Devindra Singh vs. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee, Devindra Singh, an ex-serviceman, had cash deposits of Rs. 26,20,000 in his State Bank of India account during Financial Year 2014-15. The Department issued a notice under section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act on 30.03.2022, a…
Maruti Multichem Pvt. Ltd. vs. The DCIT
The assessee, Maruti Multichem Pvt. Ltd., filed its Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring a total income of Rs. 1,79,06,740/-. The case was reopened on the basis that the assessee had received bogus loans and advances f…
Gee Ispat Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT
This appeal was preferred by Gee Ispat Pvt. Ltd. against the order dated 30.01.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi. The appeal arose out of the order dated 27.12.2017 passed under sections 147/143(3) of the Income…
Sangeeta Devi Anchalia Vs. ITO
The assessee, Sangeeta Devi Anchalia, filed her return of income under section 139(1) on 01.10.2013, declaring a total income of ₹7,02,160/-. Subsequently, her case was reopened under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, after obtaining…
Siddharth Fininvest Leasing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Kolkata
The assessee company, Siddharth Fininvest Leasing Pvt. Ltd., filed its original return of income on 30.08.2013 and subsequently revised it on 12.06.2013 declaring a loss of Rs.3,83,082/-. The return was selected for scrutiny and the assessm…
Ramasamy Kandasamy v. The ITO
The case involves the reopening of an assessment for the Assessment Year 2012-13 by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant, Ramasamy Kandasamy, is one of the trustees of 'The Karur Kongu Char…