Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 24 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Quetzal Buildtech Private Limited vs. ITO
The assessee, Quetzal Buildtech Private Limited, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 26.08.2025 for A.Y. 2016-17. The assessee raised several grounds challenging the re-assessm…
Asok Kumar S/o sher Singh vs. ITO
The assessee, Asok Kumar S/o sher Singh, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 02.06.2025 for A.Y. 2011-12, challenging the addition of Rs.4,80,8000/- towards unexplained income …
Kuldip Kumar Goel vs. ACIT (1)(1)
The appellant, Kuldip Kumar Goel, an individual, filed an original Income Tax Return for A.Y. 2012-13 declaring income of Rs. 30,85,160/-. The assessment under section 143(3) of the Act was completed on 17.03.2015 by accepting the return in…
Ranjeet Singh Vs. ITO, Ward-5(5), Patna
The assessee, Ranjeet Singh, deposited Rs. 30,50,000 in his IDBI Bank account during the relevant year, with Rs. 14,50,000 deposited during demonetization and Rs. 16,00,000 deposited in the rest of the year. The source of the deposits was c…
Navrartan Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-6(3), Kolkata
The appeals were filed by Navrartan Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. against the orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. The assessee company was incorporated on 16.07.2009 and was struck off …
Ajay Kumar Chiripal Vs ITO, Ward-43(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Ajay Kumar Chiripal, a stock broker registered with the Calcutta Stock Exchange, filed his original return under section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 19.09.2017. Subsequently, a notice under section 148 of the Act was…
ITA No.1615/KOL/2024
The assessee, Sawansukha Jewellers Private Limited, filed its return of income on 30.10.2018 declaring a total income of ₹29,74,75,300/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and the assessment was framed under section 143(3) of the Act, asse…
ITA No. 2309/KOL/2024 & CO No. 4/KOL/2025
The assessee, M/s Delightful Estate Developers LLP, filed a return of income on 21.07.2017 declaring total income at ₹ nil. A search action conducted on 25.05.2018 in the case of Banka Group of companies revealed that Mukesh Banka and assoc…
ITA No. 3164/del/2023 SRS Advertising & marketing Pvt. ltd.
The Assessee, SRS Advertising & Marketing Private Limited, did not file the return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13. An assessment order was passed under sections 147/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 30/11/2019, computing the income …
Seema Puri Vs. ITO
The case involves an appeal by the assessee, Seema Puri, against the order of the Ld. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bhubaneshwar, for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee filed an appeal on several grounds, primarily…
Niripraj Singh Sohal vs ITO Ward
The assessee, Niripraj Singh Sohal, did not file his return for the Assessment Year 2015-16 despite having salary income, interest income, and other transactions reflected on the Insight portal of the department. Consequently, the Assessing…
Jagmohan Singh Bedi Vs. ITO, Ward- 70(1)
The appellant, Jagmohan Singh Bedi, is an individual who did not file his return of income for the relevant years as his total income was below the maximum amount not chargeable to tax. He was an employee of M/s Earth Infrastructure Limited…
Hansraj Vs Income Tax Officer
In this case, the assessee, Hansraj, had not filed his return of income for the assessment year 2014-15. The Department found that the assessee had deposited a large sum of cash in his bank account during the financial year 2013-14. The Ass…
ITA No. 6232/DEL/2025
The assessee, Shri Ashish Tyagi, did not file his return of income for A.Y. 2020-21. Based on information available on the Insight Portal of the department, the Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee had made transactions amounting …
Zany Share Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(3)(4)
Assessee filed its return of income for the year under consideration on 02/03/2011 declaring total income of Rs. 657/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened u/s. 147 by issuing notice u/s…
Nadeem Mohammed Iqbal Patni vs Income Tax Officer Ward 25(3)(1), Mumbai
The appellant, Nadeem Mohammed Iqbal Patni, filed an appeal against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which dismissed his appeal against the Assessment Order dated 11/10/2023 under Section 147 read with …
Kalpana Nitin Shah Vs. ITO 19(2)(2)
The assessee, Kalpana Nitin Shah, did not file her return of income for the relevant year. Information in the NMS Module indicated that she sold an immovable property for Rs. 55,00,000/- during AY 2011-12. Since no ITR was filed within the …
Ashish Girish Jain vs Income Tax Officer – 42(1)(1), Mumbai
The assessee, Ashish Girish Jain, filed a return of income for the Assessment Year 2010-2011 declaring a total income of INR 2,92,150. A search and seizure action was conducted by the Director General of Income Tax (Investigation), Mumbai, …
Advanced Computers and Mobiles India Private Limited Vs DCIT, Circle – 1(1)(1), Mumbai
The assessee company filed its return of income for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 on 30.09.2019 declaring total income of Rs. 19.59 crores. The case of assessee was reopened under section 147. Notice under section 148 dated 31.03.2022 was se…
Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited vs. Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi
The appeal was filed by Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited against the order dated 31/03/2025 passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee challenged the reopen…