Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–7 of 7 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Harish Chander Sehgal vs ITO
The assessee filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.3,89,310/-. The case for the A.Y. 2017-18 was selected for scrutiny and assessment u/s 143(3) was completed vide order dated 30/12/2019 at Rs.1,62,96,190/-. The A.O made addi…
ITO vs M/s Ranyal Traders Pvt. Ltd.
The assessee company, incorporated on 06.11.1991, is engaged in trade of import-export and supply of clothing, hosiery, readymade garments, fabrics, textiles, trading and allied activities under the trade name of 'Ranyal Impex International…
SANCHAY JAIN vs. DCIT, CC-30, NEW DELHI
Assessee filed his return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act declaring income of Rs. 3,76,780/- on 28.12.2020. A search u/s. 132A of the Act was initiated on 7.2.2020 by the Investigation Wing, New Delhi SST-2 (Static Surveillance team) and f…
New Bhola Sons Jewellers Vs Income Tax Officer
The assessee, New Bhola Sons Jewellers, a firm engaged in the jewellery business, had cash deposits amounting to Rs.73,30,000/- during demonetization. The assessee claimed that these deposits were from cash in hand in the jewellery business…
Stream Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward-7(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Stream Suppliers Pvt. Ltd., is a domestic company that filed its return of income showing a total income of ₹1,62,100/- on 12.10.2016. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed a loss of ₹1,49,38,316/- claimed by the assessee on n…
Income Tax Officer, Ward-19(3)(1) vs Raashi Sawhney
The assessment was completed under sections 147, 144, and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, where the Assessing Officer (AO) brought to tax a sum of Rs. 8,81,25,000/- under sections 69 and 115BBE of the Act as 'unexplained investments'. The…
Triveni Devi Bhutra Vs. ITO, Ward-61(4), Kolkata
The assessee, Triveni Devi Bhutra, filed her return of income showing a total income of ₹3,33,920/-. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee had deposited ₹2,50,000/- in cash during the demonetization period and added this amount to h…