Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–7 of 7 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(4), Hapur, Uttar Pradesh Vs. Sh. Manoj Kumar Singhal
The case pertains to the assessment year 2014-15, where the Assessing Officer added Rs. 1,84,94,100/- to the assessee's income as unexplained cash credits under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This addition was based on information…
Sh. Atul Kumar Bansal Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee, Sh. Atul Kumar Bansal, an entry operator, was searched by the Income Tax Department in 2006. The search led to a consequential search assessment under section 153A r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at an income of Rs.1,9…
ITA No. 234/Del/2025 CO 228/Del/2025 Ashutosh Foods (AY: 2015-16)
The assessee, Ashutosh Foods, filed a return of income on 01.10.2015 declaring income at Rs.56,95,570/- for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessment order was passed on 29.12.2017 at the same income. Subsequently, a notice u/s 148 was is…
Natungram Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Limited Vs. ITO, Ward-42(1), Murshidabad
The assessee, Natungram Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Limited, a Primary Agricultural Credit Society, filed a return of income showing ‘NIL’ income after claiming a deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to ₹36,4…
Partha Roy vs. ITO, Ward-50(2), Kolkata
The assessee, Partha Roy, an individual, did not file his return of income for the assessment year 2017-18. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee made substantial cash deposits during the demonetiz…
ITA No.7750/Del/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08)
Search and seizure operation was carried out under section 132 of the Act at the business premises of Tinna Group of companies on 11/11/2010. During the course of the search, certain documents were found and seized belonging to the assessee…
Parvinder Kaur Sawhney vs. Pr.CIT, Delhi – 12
The assessee, Parvinder Kaur Sawhney, did not file an income tax return for the Assessment Year 2011-12. A notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was issued, but the assessee did not respond. Consequently, the assessment was c…