Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 120 of 72 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

M/s.Ashiana Manufacturing India Ltd vs. DCIT

ITA No. 2998/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench25 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

The appeal arises out of the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 07.05.2024 against the order of assessment passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 26.05.2023 by the Assessing Officer, NeF

Read summary

Mander Jain Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-59(5)

आअसं.7124/धिल्ली /2025(धि.ि. 2017-18)Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'C'24 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

The assessee, Mander Jain, entered into a partnership with Shri Rajveer Singh to run a petrol pump under the name M/s. Adarsh Service Station. The partnership was dissolved by mutual consent on 26.08.2016. The assessee received Rs.37,26,823

Read summary

Shri Shahzeb Khan vs ACIT

ITA No. 5737/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi18 Feb 2026AY 2023-24

A search and seizure action was undertaken u/s 132 in the Goyal Gas Group of cases on 10.01.2023 in which the assessee was also covered. The assessee had filed his original return for A.Y. 2023-24 on 23.07.2023, declaring total income of Rs

Read summary

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Karma Kitchen & Bar Pvt. Ltd.

ITA Nos. 5179, 4167 & 4168/Del/2025, ITA No. 3309/Del/2025, CO Nos. 246 & 247/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'E', New Delhi18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19

The assessee company, M/s. Karma Kitchen & Bar Pvt. Ltd., was registered in August 2015 and commenced operations in November 2015. A search was conducted at the premises of Nagpal Group on 10.01.2018, where documents related to the assessee

Read summary

Nawab Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO

ITA No.- 7069/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench12 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

The AO noted that the assessee had not filed its original return of income. The case was re-opened vide notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 29.03.2022 inter alia on the ground of cash deposit of Rs. 3,63,55,120/- in the bank account of the asse

Read summary

Alfa Modern Mobiles Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO

ITA No.5701/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal11 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

The assessee company is engaged in the trading of mobile phones and filed its return of income for the A.Y. 2017-18 on 08.11.2017, declaring total income at INR 8,38,870/-. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS on the issue of abn

Read summary

Jyoti Ahuja vs. ITO

ITA No.4270/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi6 Feb 2026AY 2022-23

The assessee filed her return of income declaring an income of Rs.4,06,410/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had declared commission income without substantiating the source. The Ass

Read summary

Richa Nangia vs. ACIT, Central, Circle-2.5

ITA Nos.810 & 811/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench3 Feb 2026AY 2015-16 & 2014-15

Appeals in these cases have been filed against the orders both dated 20.12.2024 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-25, Delhi pertaining to Assessment Years 2014-15 and 2015-16, respectively. Both the appeals of the assessee are revolving around commo

Read summary

Krishan Kumar Bansal, Sh. Dinesh Kumar Bansal (Legal Heir of Late Sh. Krishan Kumar Bansal) Vs. Assessing Officer, Ward-46(4), New Delhi

ITA No.4076/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench3 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

This appeal by assessee is arising out of the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre/ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), New Delhi, dated 05.07.2024 against the assessment order dated 29.09.2021 passed u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act,

Read summary

Avadhesh Kumar Panday Vs. ITO, Ward-2(4), Durgapur

I.T.A. No. 2215/Kol/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Kolkata26 Mar 2025

The assessee, Avadhesh Kumar Panday, did not file any return of income for the assessment year 2019-20 despite substantial banking transactions. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued show cause notices and, after considering the submissions by

Read summary

Islampur C.S. Shop 2

ITA No. 2191/KOL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'SMC' Bench, Kolkata21 Mar 2025

The assessee, Islampur C.S. Shop 2, is a firm running a liquor business. During the demonetization period (09.11.2016 to 31.12.2016), cash amounting to Rs.17,57,860/- and Rs.1,10,540/- were deposited in two different bank accounts of Union

Read summary

Pipasa Enterprise Bandar C.S. Shop

ITA No. 1899/KOL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA18 Mar 2025

The assessee, Pipasa Enterprise Bandar C.S. Shop, a firm, was selected for scrutiny assessment. During the scrutiny, the Assessing Officer found a cash deposit of Rs. 21,10,000/- in the bank account during the demonetization period. The ass

Read summary

Sandip Kumar Keshari Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1)

ITA No. 349/KOL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, KOLKATA11 Mar 2025

The assessee, Sandip Kumar Keshari, did not file any return of income for the assessment year 2017-18. The proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act were initiated by issuing a notice under section 148 on 24.03.2021. The case was

Read summary

Inder Mohan Singh Saluja Vs. ITO

ITA No:- 300/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH: ‘C’: NEW DELHI)28 Mar 2025

The assessee, Inder Mohan Singh Saluja, filed his income tax return for the Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring a net taxable income of Rs. 13,02,480/-. A survey operation under section 133A of the Income Tax Act was conducted at his business

Read summary

Ravinder Yadav Vs CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi

ITA No. 3917/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI20 Mar 2025

This appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2017-18, where the assessee, Ravinder Yadav, challenges the correctness of an unexplained money addition of Rs. 1,96,45,440/- under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The addition was upheld

Read summary

Braham Singh Vs Income Tax Officer/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi

ITA Nos.3940 & 3942/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH, ‘A’: NEW DELHI19 Mar 2025

In this case, the Assessing Officer had information that the assessee had purchased a time deposit of Rs.75 lakhs with Oriental Bank of Commerce and further an amount of Rs.81,08,342/- was credited in the assessee’s account under section 19

Read summary

Sushmita Gupta vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 3741/DEL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘G’19 Mar 2025

In this case, the assessment was completed under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Assessing Officer (AO) vide order dated 05.12.2019. The AO made an addition under section 69A of Rs.93,10,000/- for unexplained investment in pr

Read summary

Seema Devi Jain Vs. ACIT

ITA No. 3598/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI, DELHI BENCH ‘G’ NEW DELHI19 Mar 2025

The case involves Seema Devi Jain, who filed her return of income declaring income of Rs. 1,93,75,760/-. The case was selected for ‘complete scrutiny’ through CASS on the issues of ‘Sales turnover/receipts, cash deposit during demonetizatio

Read summary

VED PRAKASH VS. ITO, WARD 3, REWARI HARYANA

ITA NO. 2508/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH “SMC”, NEW DELHI11 Mar 2025

The assessee, Ved Prakash, deposited cash of Rs. 18,85,500/- in his bank accounts with Oriental Bank of Commerce during the demonetization period. The Assessing Officer (AO) found that no return of income was filed by the assessee for the a

Read summary

RAHUL JAIN VS. ITO, WARD 59(8), NEW DELHI

ITA NO. 1235/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH11 Mar 2025

The assessee, Rahul Jain, an individual, e-filed his return of income on 31.7.2017 declaring a total income of Rs. 4,95,970/-. His case was selected for scrutiny under CASS. During the demonetization period, the assessee deposited cash of R

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning