Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 15 of 5 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Sameer Bahadur vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-59(3), Delhi

ITA No. 5554/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench5 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

The appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 10.07.2025 pertaining to AY 2016-17. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. The assessee has filed an appeal contesting

Read summary

Rohit Manchanda Vs. ITO

ITA No. 5124/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'E', New Delhi12 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 based on information that the assessee had sold an immovable property for Rs.1.83 crores during the financial year 2011-12 related to assessment year 2012-13. The asses

Read summary

Krishan Kumar Vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No.1552/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench2 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

The assessee, Krishan Kumar, sold a residential property located at Plot No.540, Pocket-A, Sector-22, Gurgaon, for Rs.1.30 crores during the Financial Year 2016-17. He purchased another residential plot and incurred construction costs. The

Read summary

Rohit Bajoria Vs ITO, Ward-62(1), Kolkata

ITA No. 1568/KOL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, KOLKATA24 Mar 2025

The assessee, Rohit Bajoria, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2019-20 on 30.08.2019. The Central Processing Centre (CPC) issued a show cause notice questioning why his claim under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, wa

Read summary

Mr. Subhash Suryakant Phadkar Vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No.3490/Mum/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI22 Jan 2026

The assessee, Mr. Subhash Suryakant Phadkar, received Rs.53,50,500 from M/s. Kalpataru Properties Pvt. Ltd. as compensation for the redevelopment of his flat. The amount included Rs.25,00,000 for compensation for the builder's failure to ad

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning