Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 91 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Rajesh Chaudhary vs DCIT
The appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi dated 26.09.2025 arising out of the order dated 27.03.2024 passed under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the DC…
R.G. International Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Karnal
The assessee, R.G. International Private Limited, filed appeals against the orders of the learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak, for the Assessment Years 2014-15, 2015-16, and 2016-17. The appeals pertain to the invocation of…
Quartzelec Limited v. DCIT
The appellant, Quartzelec Limited, a UK-based company, did not file a return of income for AY 2018-19 as no income accrued/arose in India which was taxable. The reassessment proceedings were initiated by the Assessing Officer under Section …
Anuneet Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer
The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2015-16 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1078404533(1) dated 11.07.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was proceeded ex-…
Jay Iber Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi
The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2013-14 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1079275922(1) dated 05.08.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The learned cou…
Anju Kesarwani Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee sold 4,000 shares of PMC Fincorp Ltd. and declared Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) of Rs. 8,59,559/-. The STCG was duly disclosed in the return of income. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Act accepting the re…
Gopal vs Income Tax Officer
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2019-20 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1079395083(1) dated 07.08.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Case called tw…
Pushpa vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-44(6), New Delhi
The assessee filed two appeals against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s order refusing to condone the delay in filing of the lower appeals. The CIT(A)/NFAC had refused to condone the delay of 535 days (ITA No. 5599/Del/2025) and 398 days (ITA No. 5…
Heritage Lamps vs. ITO
The assessee, Heritage Lamps, filed returns of income for various assessment years. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and reassessment proceedings were initiated. The assessee filed appeals against the rea…
Pankaj Gupta Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Faridabad, Harayan 121002
The Assessing Officer (AO) made an assessment under Section 144 read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, adding Rs.12,78,000/- on account of undisclosed sources for making cash deposits in the bank. The assessee filed an appeal be…
Deepak Jaiswal Vs. Income Tax Officer
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 01.01.2026, for Assessment Year 2020-21. The assessee has raised multipl…
NAVYUG TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. ITO, WARD 18(2)
The appeal by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in Appeal No. CIT(A), Delhi-6/10768/2019-20 dated 2.8.2024. The assessment was framed by the ITO, Ward 18(2), New Delhi u/s. 143(3)/…
Mahaveera Rice World (known as Mahavira Rice World LLP) Vs DCIT Circle 46(1)
The assessee firm M/s Mahaveera Rice World filed its return for A.Y 2014-15 on 07.08.2014, declaring total income of Rs. 15,64,030/-. The original assessment was completed u/s 143(3) by ITO Ward 46(2) Delhi vide order dated 21.12.2016 at as…
M/s Stance Consumer Electronics Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT
The assessee, M/s Stance Consumer Electronics Pvt. Ltd., filed returns declaring losses and income for AY 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively. The case was reopened and reassessed based on alleged accommodation entries and unexplained credits.…
Rohit Manchanda Vs. ITO
The Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 based on information that the assessee had sold an immovable property for Rs.1.83 crores during the financial year 2011-12 related to assessment year 2012-13. The asses…
MJH Marketing Consultants Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT
The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2019-20 arises against the CIT(A)-29, New Delhi’s DIN & order dated 08.01.2026 in case No. CIT(A), Delhi-29/10873/2018-19, in proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The learned counsel sub…
Amit Bajaj HUF vs Income Tax Officer
The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2020-21 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082974326(1) dated 25.11.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The learned counsel submit…
Braham Prakash vs Income Tax Officer
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13 arises against the C IT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1078546788(1) dated 16.07.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The delay of …
Raman Garg vs. ITO, Ward-1
The appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 03.10.2024 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) arising out of the assessment order dated 21.03.2023 u/s 147 r.w.s 144 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 19…
Bhawana Sharma vs Income Tax Officer
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2016-17 arises against the C IT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1084222412(1) dated 30.12.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The first and…