Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 2140 of 72 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

AZAD SINGH VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(1), SAHARANPUR UP

ITA NO. 3740/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH “SMC”, NEW DELHI10 Mar 2025

The assessee, Azad Singh, did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2012-13. During the year, he made cash deposits totaling Rs. 27,45,500/- into his savings bank account at Punjab National Bank, Saharanpur. Based on these dep

Read summary

CHETNA SUNDARAM VS. DCIT, CIRCLE 70(1), NEW DELHI

ITA NO. 2512/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH10 Mar 2025

The assessee, Chetna Sundaram, deposited Rs. 2,00,000 in her HDFC Bank Ltd. savings account. The source of this deposit remained unexplained despite being given ample opportunity to provide documentation. Consequently, this amount was deeme

Read summary

Shruti Lal Vs. DCIT

ITA No. 2019/Del/2023Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘G’, New Delhi7 Mar 2025

A search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was carried out in Sh. Kshitij Lal Group cases. A search warrant of authorization under section 132 of the Act was issued in the name of the Assessee on 03/04/2019

Read summary

Gulshan Chawla Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward 59(4), New Delhi

ITA No. 585/DEL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI5 Mar 2025

The appellant/assessee filed an e-return of income-tax declaring a total income of Rs.5,68,839/- on 31.03.2018. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 and selected for scrutiny assessment under Section 143

Read summary

Ashish Gupta Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-8, New Delhi

ITA No.2935/Del/2022Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘A’3 Mar 2025

The relevant facts giving rise to this appeal are that the search operations were carried out on the assessee along with Sanjay Singhal Group of cases on 15.11.2017. During the search operations, the cash of Rs.19,00,000/- was seized from t

Read summary

YASHU IRON PRIVATE LIMITED, VS. DCIT, CC-32, DELHI

ITA No. 6420/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘A’ : NEW DELHI)28 Jan 2026

The case involves an appeal by Yashu Iron Private Limited against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-30, New Delhi, which confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer (AO) in making disallowance of Rs. 7,02,000/- on account of interest expenses u

Read summary

White Orchid Hospitality (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT

ITA No.5130/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Benches : E : New Delhi9 Jan 2026

The case involves an appeal by White Orchid Hospitality (P) Ltd. against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi, which upheld an assessment order by the Assessing Officer (AO) for the Assessment Year 2021-22. Th

Read summary

Rajput Mohammadmuntasim Tashbihuddin Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-28(1), New Delhi

ITA No.- 3958/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench28 Jan 2026

The assessee, Rajput Mohammadmuntasim Tashbihuddin, received foreign remittances amounting to Rs. 1,58,83,009/- in his bank account with J & K Bank during F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y 2018-19. He claimed to have received an export order for

Read summary

Puneet Kohli vs Assessment Unit

ITA No. 6228/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘A’, New Delhi14 Jan 2026

The assessee, Shri Puneet Kohli, filed a return for Assessment Year 2020-21 declaring income of Rs. 5,55,490/-. The department re-opened the case due to information regarding cash deposits of Rs. 3,54,07,511/- and Rs. 2,23,99,000/- in the a

Read summary

N S Associates Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2)(5)

ITA No.9012/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH22 Jan 2026

The case pertains to the assessment year 2017-18. The Income Tax Officer had treated the assessee’s cash deposits during demonetization amounting to Rs.26.17 lakh as unexplained under section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961. T

Read summary

Lalit Kumar vs ITO Gurugram

ITA No. 6304/DEL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI14 Jan 2026

The assessee, Shri Lalit Kumar, an agriculturist, did not file his return for Assessment Year 2015-16. Based on information from the department's insight portal regarding cash deposits in his bank account, a notice under section 148 was iss

Read summary

GAURAV BHATIA, VS. ITO, WARD 70(5), C-9, WESTERN COLONY, NEW DELHI

ITA No. 5531/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ : NEW DELHI)22 Jan 2026

The assessee, Gaurav Bhatia, an individual, filed a return declaring total income of Rs. 2,73,320/- under the head ‘salary’ and ‘other sources’ for the assessment year 2017-18. The case was selected for Complete Scrutiny under CASS due to '

Read summary

Dinesh Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(4), Gurgaon, Haryana

ITA No.5503/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench14 Jan 2026

The case involves Dinesh Kumar, who deposited Rs.47,50,000/- in cash in his bank account and made an investment in immovable property worth Rs.1,30,50,000/- during the previous year relevant to Assessment Year 2015-16. The Income Tax Office

Read summary

Akshay Anand vs AO

ITA No. 2273/DEL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI8 Jan 2026

The assessee, Akshay Anand, filed a return for A.Y. 2016-17 declaring an income of Rs. 7,88,850/-. The case was re-opened under section 147 to verify unexplained investments and receipts. The assessment was completed at an income of Rs. 66,

Read summary

Sumitra Devi Bihani vs. ITO, Ward-1(2), Siliguri

ITA No.2588/Kol/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Kolkata16 Jan 2026

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee, Sumitra Devi Bihani, against the order of the NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'Ld. CIT(A)') dated 26.10.2023 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as

Read summary

Neptune Fincot Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, Circle-15(1)(2), Mumbai

ITA No. 3946/MUM/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'B' BENCH, MUMBAI6 Jan 2026

This appeal by Neptune Fincot Pvt. Ltd. is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dated 09.07.2024 for A.Y. 2014-15. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, primarily challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings un

Read summary

M/s Neeta Developer Vs. ITO/ NFAC, Delhi

I.T.A. No. 7316/Mum/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI19 Jan 2026

The appeal is preferred by M/s Neeta Developer against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) / National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 19.09.2025 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The original assessment order was passed

Read summary

Mr. Dhiren Pradip Sadiwala Vs. ITO, Ward-23(1)(6)

I.T.A. No.5551/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), 'SMC' Bench, Mumbai21 Jan 2026

The assessee, Mr. Dhiren Pradip Sadiwala, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2012-13 declaring a total income of Rs. 7,55,020/-. A search and seizure action under section 132 of the Income Tax Act was carried out in the case

Read summary

Manisha Kamalkar Sadavarte vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 3729/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “H(SMC)” Bench1 Jan 2026

The case pertains to the assessment year 2017-18 where the Assessing Officer (AO) brought to tax a sum of Rs. 10,05,000/- as unexplained money under section 69A read with section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of cash deposi

Read summary

Jai Bhavani Reti Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. Vs ITO, Ward-4(1), Thane

ITA No. 7310/MUM/2025 (AY : 2016-17)INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SMC BENCH, MUMBAI20 Jan 2026

The assessee, Jai Bhavani Reti Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., raised multiple grounds of appeal against the assessment order of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dated 20.08.2025 for A.Y. 2016-17. The main grounds of appeal were the addition of Rs. 27,00

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning