Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 21–40 of 119 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
RMP Holdings Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee filed its return of income declaring total income on 13.09.2012 and the assessment order was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 03.03.2015 at a total income of Rs 2,02,040/-. Thereafter, reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were…
Shamim Ahmad Vs The I.T.O
The assessee, Shamim Ahmad, is engaged in the trading of livestock. He filed his return of income on 25.07.2012 declaring an income of Rs. 4,99,507/-. The case was reopened vide notice u/s 148 dated 28.03.2019 and completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s…
M/s Keynesian Financial Services Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle-7(1)
The assessee, M/s Keynesian Financial Services Ltd., filed its return of income on 21.09.2013, declaring a total income of ₹ 84,930/-. The assessee was engaged in financing and dealing in shares and securities. The case was reopened under s…
Vishnu Purohit Vs. ITO, Ward-61(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Vishnu Purohit, an individual, did not file his return of income for the assessment year 2016-17 as his income was below the taxable limit. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the case based on information from the In…
Birendra Nath Saha Vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Malda
The assessee, Birendra Nath Saha, filed his return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 16,68,790/-. The case was reopened as information indicated that the assessee had a turnover of Rs. 36,48,32,670/- for FY 2013-14, but the accounts…
Satbir Mahato Vs. ITO, Ward 24(3)
The assessee, Satbir Mahato, filed a return of income declaring a total income of ₹18,600/-. His case was reopened under section 147 of the Act due to large cash deposits into his bank account. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued notices and …
Sandip Kumar Keshari Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1)
The assessee, Sandip Kumar Keshari, did not file any return of income for the assessment year 2017-18. The proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act were initiated by issuing a notice under section 148 on 24.03.2021. The case was …
Trimline Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward-10(2), Kolkata
The assessee, Trimline Agencies Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for AY 2012-13 declaring total income at Rs. 11,560/- and deemed total income u/s 115JB at Rs. 7,989/-. The return was processed, and the case was reopened with a notice …
Jermel's Accademy Vs. ITO, Ward-1(4), Siliguri
The assessee, Jermel's Accademy, a trust running a co-educational school affiliated with CBSE, had made cash deposits amounting to Rs. 3,20,49,890/-. Based on this, proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were initiated, a…
V Mart Retails Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Circle-7(1), Kolkata
The assessee company, V Mart Retails Ltd., filed its return of income on 13.08.2012 declaring a total income of Rs. 16,32,48,820/-. Subsequently, due to information received from the Investigation Wing indicating heavy transactions in the b…
North India Wires Limited Vs. DCIT, Circle 3(1), Kolkata
The return was filed on 29.03.2013, declaring total income of Rs.3,04,06,700/-. The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing LPG Cylinders. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and assessment was framed vide order …
Hooghly Dock & Port Engineers Limited vs. DCIT, Circle(1), Kolkata
This appeal arises from an order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. The assessee, Hooghly Dock & Port Engineers Limited, f…
Sunita Gupta vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The case involves Sunita Gupta, who was assessed for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The Assessing Officer (AO) passed an order under sections 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, adding Rs. 3,54,565/- to her business income as bogus profit…
New Bharat Paints vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
The assessee, New Bharat Paints, did not file its return of income for Assessment Year 2010-11. Consequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) issued a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 31.03.2017. During the assessment proc…
Cairs Computer Aided Information and Research Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO
The appellant, Cairs Computer Aided Information and Research Services Pvt. Ltd., filed returns of income for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) issued notices under Section 148 of the Income-Tax…
Braham Singh Vs Income Tax Officer/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi
In this case, the Assessing Officer had information that the assessee had purchased a time deposit of Rs.75 lakhs with Oriental Bank of Commerce and further an amount of Rs.81,08,342/- was credited in the assessee’s account under section 19…
ITA No. 6206 to 6210/Del/2015 & CO 398 to 401/Del/2015 Green Mark Infra Ltd. ITA No. 6221 to 6224/Del/2015 & CO Nos. 191 to 194/Del/2018 Moderate Credit Corp. Pvt. Ltd.
The assessees, Green Mark Infra Limited and Moderate Credit Corporation Private Limited, filed their original Income Tax Returns for various assessment years. The Assessing Officer received information that the assessees were engaged in pro…
FOOD RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS CENTRE vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), NEW DELHI
The assessee, FOOD RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS CENTRE, did not file its return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 in compliance with a notice under section 148 of the Act. The assessee submitted that its name was changed in August 2008 to …
Raj Kumar Sharma vs. ITO, Ward 32 (5)
The assessee, Raj Kumar Sharma, an individual, did not file the return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee had cash deposits of Rs.5,80,…
SHREEJI INFRA PROJECTS VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER/ASSESSMENT UNIT, NEW DELHI
The assessee, SHREEJI INFRA PROJECTS, sold immovable property worth Rs. 87,75,000/- but did not file an income tax return under section 139(1) of the Act nor offered the financial transactions for taxation. Consequently, an action under sec…