Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 2140 of 61 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Ashish Gupta Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-8, New Delhi

ITA No.2935/Del/2022Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘A’3 Mar 2025

The relevant facts giving rise to this appeal are that the search operations were carried out on the assessee along with Sanjay Singhal Group of cases on 15.11.2017. During the search operations, the cash of Rs.19,00,000/- was seized from t

Read summary

White Orchid Hospitality (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT

ITA No.5130/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Benches : E : New Delhi9 Jan 2026

The case involves an appeal by White Orchid Hospitality (P) Ltd. against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi, which upheld an assessment order by the Assessing Officer (AO) for the Assessment Year 2021-22. Th

Read summary

Sunil Kumar Singh vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 60 (5), Delhi

ITA No.3657/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Benches ‘F’, New Delhi28 Jan 2026

The assessee, Sunil Kumar Singh, has filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 03.03.2025 for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The appeal raises se

Read summary

Rajput Mohammadmuntasim Tashbihuddin Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-28(1), New Delhi

ITA No.- 3958/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench28 Jan 2026

The assessee, Rajput Mohammadmuntasim Tashbihuddin, received foreign remittances amounting to Rs. 1,58,83,009/- in his bank account with J & K Bank during F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y 2018-19. He claimed to have received an export order for

Read summary

N S Associates Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2)(5)

ITA No.9012/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH22 Jan 2026

The case pertains to the assessment year 2017-18. The Income Tax Officer had treated the assessee’s cash deposits during demonetization amounting to Rs.26.17 lakh as unexplained under section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961. T

Read summary

M/s. Shree Raj Mahal Gems Private Limited Vs. DCIT Central Circle – 6

ITA No.4886/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, ‘C’: New Delhi30 Jan 2026

This appeal is filed by the assessee, M/s. Shree Raj Mahal Gems Private Limited, against the order of the Ld.CIT(A)-24, New Delhi dated 17.07.2025 for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, including the

Read summary

Manoj Kumar vs ITO

ITA No.3378/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi 'A' Bench, New Delhi29 Jan 2026

The assessee, Manoj Kumar, filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2018-19 declaring a total income of INR 5,12,820/-. The case was re-opened by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the

Read summary

Lalit Kumar vs ITO Gurugram

ITA No. 6304/DEL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI14 Jan 2026

The assessee, Shri Lalit Kumar, an agriculturist, did not file his return for Assessment Year 2015-16. Based on information from the department's insight portal regarding cash deposits in his bank account, a notice under section 148 was iss

Read summary

Innus Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT

ITA No.4617/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI23 Jan 2026

The present appeal is filed by Innus Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. against the order dated 05.06.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. The assessee has challenged the appellate or

Read summary

Horizon HGE Electronic Equipment India Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT

ITA No.2695/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi 'B' Bench, New Delhi16 Jan 2026

The assessee, Horizon HGE Electronic Equipment India Pvt. Ltd., is a company that derived income from business and filed its return of income on 14.10.2020, declaring a total income of INR 2,42,00,780/- and paid taxes at the concessional ra

Read summary

GAURAV BHATIA, VS. ITO, WARD 70(5), C-9, WESTERN COLONY, NEW DELHI

ITA No. 5531/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ : NEW DELHI)22 Jan 2026

The assessee, Gaurav Bhatia, an individual, filed a return declaring total income of Rs. 2,73,320/- under the head ‘salary’ and ‘other sources’ for the assessment year 2017-18. The case was selected for Complete Scrutiny under CASS due to '

Read summary

C.R. Investments Vs. ACIT, Circle-28(1), Delhi

ITA No.900/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench: ‘E’ New Delhi22 Jan 2026

The case pertains to the assessment year 2018-19, where the assessee, C.R. Investments, appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [CIT(A)/NFAC], Delhi. The CIT(A)/NFAC had upheld

Read summary

AVR Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Ward-14(1), Kolkata

ITA No.2596/KOL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Kolkata12 Jan 2026

The assessee, AVR Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd., is a Private Limited Company engaged in trading and hotel operations. It filed its return of income for A.Y. 2018–19 declaring a total income of ₹9,40,973. The case was selected for scrutiny, an

Read summary

Tanuj Pahilaj Lalwani vs Income Tax Officer Ward 27(3)(1)

I.T.A No.7340/Mum/2025, I.T.A. No.7558/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench ‘E’, Mumbai13 Jan 2026

The assessee, Tanuj Pahilaj Lalwani, is a non-filer of income-tax returns. He, along with his father, purchased a flat for Rs.1.50 crore on 08.09.2017. The case was reopened based on information from the Sub-Registrar, Mumbai. The assessee

Read summary

Sukir Ladaku Naik Vs ITO, 28(3)(1), Mumbai

ITA No. 5912/MUM/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SMC BENCH, MUMBAI6 Jan 2026

The assessee, Sukir Ladaku Naik, is an individual and proprietor of Sanjay Country Bar, engaged in the business of selling Indian-made liquor. All sales during the relevant financial year were in cash, which were deposited in bank accounts

Read summary

M/s. R.M. Bhuther and Co. Vs. National Faceless Appeal Centre

ITA No.7294/Mum/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI23 Jan 2026

The assessee, M/s. R.M. Bhuther and Co., a partnership firm, filed its original return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring total income at Rs.Nil. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Th

Read summary

Manisha Kamalkar Sadavarte vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 3729/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “H(SMC)” Bench1 Jan 2026

The case pertains to the assessment year 2017-18 where the Assessing Officer (AO) brought to tax a sum of Rs. 10,05,000/- as unexplained money under section 69A read with section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of cash deposi

Read summary

Bina Ghosh vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 5877/MUM/2025 & ITA No. 5878/MUM/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH, MUMBAI19 Jan 2026

The assessee, Bina Ghosh, did not file an income tax return for the financial year relevant to Assessment Year 2016-17 as she had no taxable income. Her husband purchased a residential property, and her name was included in the sale deed. T

Read summary

Amit Rango Ramgopal Vs ITO, Ward-24(1)(1), Mumbai

ITA No. 5905/MUM/2025 (AY : 2017-18)INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SMC BENCH, MUMBAI27 Jan 2026

The assessee, Amit Rango Ramgopal, filed an appeal against the assessment order of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 31.07.2025 for Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee raised grounds of appeal against the addition of Rs. 28,65,453/- under

Read summary

Santlal Enterprise Vs. ITO, Ward 1(1)

ITA No. 822/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA15 Oct 2025

The assessee, Santlal Enterprise, filed a return of income on 08.06.2018 declaring total income at ₹nil. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS, and the assessee complied with statutory notices by providing various details and eviden

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning