Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 16 of 6 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Neptune Fincot Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, Circle-15(1)(2), Mumbai

ITA No. 3946/MUM/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'B' BENCH, MUMBAI6 Jan 2026

This appeal by Neptune Fincot Pvt. Ltd. is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dated 09.07.2024 for A.Y. 2014-15. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, primarily challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings un

Read summary

M/s Neeta Developer Vs. ITO/ NFAC, Delhi

I.T.A. No. 7316/Mum/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI19 Jan 2026

The appeal is preferred by M/s Neeta Developer against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) / National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 19.09.2025 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The original assessment order was passed

Read summary

Javed Munir Khan Vs. ITO 26(1)(4)

ITA No. 5428/MUM/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench ‘F’13 Jan 2026

The case involves Javed Munir Khan, who deposited aggregate cash amounting to ₹1,13,28,200 during the demonetization period and ₹92,64,140 during the post-demonetization period. The Assessing Officer treated the deposits as unexplained mone

Read summary

Balaram Nama Gaikwad vs IIO, Ward – 3(1), Kalyan

ITA No. 5128/MUM/2025 & ITA No. 5129/MUM/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI19 Jan 2026

These two appeals by assessee, Balaram Nama Gaikwad, are directed against the separate orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] both dated 26.06.2025 for Assessment years (AY) 2014-15 & 2016-17 respectively. The a

Read summary

Astoria Agro and Allied Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT-Central Circle 4(3) Mumbai

ITA No.4733/Mum/2025, ITA No.4732/Mum/2025, ITA No.4719/Mum/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘A’ BENCH, MUMBAI28 Jan 2026

The facts of the case revolve around a search and seizure action conducted under section 132 of the Income-tax Act at the premises of M/s Renukamata Multi State Cooperative Urban Credit Society Ltd. and its key persons on 26.05.2017. The As

Read summary

Apurva Mukesh Thakkar Vs. ITO Ward 41(2)(1) Mumbai

ITA No. 6367/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench Mumbai22 Jan 2026

The assessee, Apurva Mukesh Thakkar, is an individual who was carrying on business as a proprietor of M/s Bhavana Televentures during the relevant previous year. He did not file a return of income under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act,

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning