Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 21–37 of 37 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
M/s Muse Advertising And Media Private Limited vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-10(3), Kolkata
The assessee, M/s Muse Advertising And Media Private Limited, filed a return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 declaring a total income of Rs.3,750/-. The case was originally assessed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961…
Kakoli Debanshi Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1)
The assessee, Kakoli Debanshi, is a non-filer of return. However, records indicate that she entered into a transaction involving the transfer of capital assets worth ₹40,00,000 and deposited cash amounting to ₹20,34,000 during the year. Con…
ACIT, Circle-4(1), Kolkata vs. Victor Tradelink Pvt. Ltd.
The assessee, Victor Tradelink Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income declaring a total income of Rs.1,75,152/-. The Assessing Officer received information from the Investigation wing indicating that the assessee had received accommodation e…
Sumangal Jewels Private Limited vs. DCIT, Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata
The facts in brief are that the search and seizure action as well as survey operation were conducted on 01.12.2025 on Bhalotia Group of Companies as well as residential premises of Director/partners at different places at Raniganj, Asansol,…
Satupur Samabay Unnayan Samity Ltd vs. ITO, Ward-27(3), Haldia
The assessee, Satupur Samabay Unnayan Samity Ltd, did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2018-19. The case was reopened by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on 29.03.2022. In response to the not…
Laxmi Gupta vs. ITO Ward 3(2), Darjeeling
The assessee, Laxmi Gupta, filed her return of income on 25.09.2016 declaring a total income of Rs. 2,79,500/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by issuing a notice under section 148 on 12.07.2021. The reo…
DCIT, Circle-13(1), Kolkata vs. Century Aluminium MFG Company Ltd.
The assessee, Century Aluminium MFG Company Ltd., filed its return of income for AY 2012-13 declaring a loss of Rs. 3,67,08,876/-. The case was reopened by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on a statement…
Debasis Mukhopadhyay vs. Income Tax Officer
The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the case of the assessee, Debasis Mukhopadhyay, under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by issuing a notice under Section 148 on 26.03.2008, following information that the assessee had booked bogus…
DCIT, Circle-13(2), Kolkata vs. Padma Logistic And Khanij Pvt. Ltd.
The assessee company, Padma Logistic And Khanij Pvt. Ltd., filed its return declaring a total income of Rs.7,18,83,570/- on 24/09/2009 electronically. The return was processed under section 143(1) and the case was selected for a regular ass…
Avishkar Nirman Private Ltd Vs ITO Ward-13(1), Kolkata
This is an appeal filed by Avishkar Nirman Private Ltd against the order of the ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 16.09.2025 for the assessment year 2013-2014. The original assessment under section 143(3) of t…
Anusua Ghosh Vs ACIT Circle-29, Kolkata
This is an appeal filed by the assessee, Anusua Ghosh, against the order of the ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 31.08.2024 for the assessment year 2014-2015. The assessee is challenging the notice issued und…
M/s. Shroff Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Ward-1(1), Kolkata
The assessee, M/s. Shroff Properties Pvt. Ltd., is a Private Limited company engaged in business for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The Assessing Officer received information from the Investigation Wing about an accommodation entry received b…
JCIT, (IN-SITU), Circle-4(1), Kolkata Vs. Tezas Trading Company Pvt. Ltd.
The appeal was preferred by the revenue against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which quashed the assessment order made by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer…
Neena Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT(OSD), Ward-1(2)
The assessee, Neena Commercial Pvt. Ltd., filed a return of income on 29.09.2010. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information from the Director of Income Tax (Investigation) indicating that large cash deposits were made in ICICI Bank br…
Arnab Kumar Goswami vs. ITO, Ward-62(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Arnab Kumar Goswami, filed his return of income declaring a total income of Rs.3,52,310/- for the assessment year 2017-18. He purchased an immovable property at Rajarhat for Rs.25,00,000/-, while the stamp duty value was Rs.35…
Sangeeta Devi Anchalia Vs. ITO
The assessee, Sangeeta Devi Anchalia, filed her return of income under section 139(1) on 01.10.2013, declaring a total income of ₹7,02,160/-. Subsequently, her case was reopened under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, after obtaining…
Siddharth Fininvest Leasing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Kolkata
The assessee company, Siddharth Fininvest Leasing Pvt. Ltd., filed its original return of income on 30.08.2013 and subsequently revised it on 12.06.2013 declaring a loss of Rs.3,83,082/-. The return was selected for scrutiny and the assessm…