Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 141160 of 245 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Uthaan Foundation Vs ADIT, CPC, Bengaluru

ITA Nos.948 & 949/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA4 Sept 2025

The assessee, Uthaan Foundation, has filed appeals against the orders passed by the ld.Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Mumbai for the assessment years 2018-2019 & 2020-2021. The ld.AR has prayed for the appeals to be remitted back to the ld.CIT(A) on the

Read summary

The Agri Horticulture Society of India Vs ITO Ward-1 (3), Exemption, Kolkata

ITA No.1427/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, KOLKATA4 Sept 2025

The Agri Horticulture Society of India filed an appeal against the order dated 14.05.2025 passed by the ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, for the assessment year 2021-2022. Subsequently, the assessee sought to withdraw the

Read summary

Raghav Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT, Circle-9(1), Kolkata

ITA No.677/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA4 Sept 2025

The assessee, Raghav Vanijya Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against the order dated 09.08.2023 passed by the ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the assessment year 2012-2013. The appeal was filed belatedly by 518 days.

Read summary

Praveen Kumar Patwa HUF Vs ITO Ward-47 (2), Kolkata

ITA No.1333/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA4 Sept 2025

The assessee, Praveen Kumar Patwa HUF, has filed an appeal against the order dated 23.05.2025 passed by the ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the assessment year 2015-2016. The primary contention of the assessee i

Read summary

Maithan Ceramic Limited vs ACIT, Circle-7(1), Kolkata

ITA No.1944/KOL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Kolkata1 Jan 2026

Maithan Ceramic Limited, engaged in manufacturing and dealing in refractory goods, filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2011-12 declaring a total income of ₹28,82,17,350/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and the assessmen

Read summary

ITA No.1584/KOL/2024

1584/KOL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ B” BENCH, KOLKATA2 Jan 2026

The assessee, Binoy Agarwal, is in the business of trading in furnishing items. For the assessment year 2021-22, the assessee filed a return declaring a total income of ₹1,33,64,769/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and the Assessing O

Read summary

Ashrama Praktan Chhatra Sangha Vs The CIT(Exemption), Kolkata

ITA No.1389 & 1390/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, KOLKATA4 Sept 2025

The assessee, Ashrama Praktan Chhatra Sangha, filed two appeals against the orders of the CIT(Exemption), Kolkata, both dated 21.12.2024. The appeals were initially barred by 122 days each, but the delay was condoned upon the assessee's app

Read summary

Welcome Distilleries Private Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Central Circle 2(2)

ITA No.1546 to 1549/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA15 Oct 2025

These are appeals preferred by the assessee, Welcome Distilleries Private Ltd., against the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Delhi-25, dated 14.01.2025 for the Assessment Years 2014-15, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19. The lear

Read summary

Sunil Bhagat Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1), Gangtok

ITA No.1643/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA15 Oct 2025

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee, Sunil Bhagat, against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Ld. CIT(A)) dated 17.06.2025 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The learned CIT (A) dismissed the appeal of the assess

Read summary

Shashi Todi Vs ITO, Ward-47(2), Kolkata

ITA No.2666/KOL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, KOLKATA14 Oct 2025

This is an appeal filed by the assessee, Shashi Todi, against the order dated 21.10.2024, passed by the Id. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment year 2017-2018. The assessee had multiple opportunities to

Read summary

Santlal Enterprise Vs. ITO, Ward 1(1)

ITA No. 822/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA15 Oct 2025

The assessee, Santlal Enterprise, filed a return of income on 08.06.2018 declaring total income at ₹nil. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS, and the assessee complied with statutory notices by providing various details and eviden

Read summary

Sanjay Kumar Drolia Vs ITO Ward-49(1), Kolkata

ITA No.1025/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA14 Oct 2025

The assessee, Sanjay Kumar Drolia, filed his original return of income for the Assessment Year 2015-2016 declaring a total income of Rs.9,11,110/-. The Assessing Officer received information that the assessee was involved in facilitating ac

Read summary

Sampa Majhi Vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No.534/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA15 Oct 2025

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee, Sampa Majhi, against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, dated 27.12.2024 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessment order passed by the learned Assessing Officer (AO) a

Read summary

Saktinagar Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 41(1), Nadia

ITA No.1189/KOL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “D” Bench, Kolkata27 Oct 2025

The assessee, Saktinagar Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd., filed its return of income on 01.03.2017 declaring total income as nil. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 on 06.04.2021. Sub

Read summary

Rajeev Nain Mishra Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1), Gangtok

ITA No. 1916/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA28 Oct 2025

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee, Rajeev Nain Mishra, against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Ld. CIT(A)) dated 26.06.2025 for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The counsel for the assessee submitted that the

Read summary

Rabindra Nath Kundu Vs CIT(A), NFAC

ITA No.1825/KOL/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, KOLKATA14 Oct 2025

This is an appeal filed by the assessee, Rabindra Nath Kundu, against the order dated 21.10.2024, passed by the Id. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment year 2017-2018. The appeal of the assessee is barr

Read summary

Promising Exports Pvt. ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle 11(1)

ITA No.1296/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, KOLKATA15 Oct 2025

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee, Promising Exports Pvt. Ltd., against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Ld. CIT(A)) dated 27.03.2025 for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The appeal was filed with a delay of 16

Read summary

Padmini Retailers Private Ltd. vs. ITO Ward, 10(2)

ITA No.1459/KOL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “D” Bench, Kolkata15 Oct 2025

This is an appeal preferred by Padmini Retailers Private Ltd. against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi dated 27.05.2024 for the Assessment Year 2012-13. The appeal was filed with a delay of 341 days, for which a condo

Read summary

OAS Realty Private Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 14(1), Kolkata

ITA No. 1831/KOL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Kolkata27 Oct 2025

This is an appeal preferred by OAS Realty Private Ltd. against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Ld. CIT(A)) dated 23.05.2025 for the Assessment Year 2022-23. The appeal was initially dismissed ex-parte by the Ld. CIT

Read summary

Income Tax Officer, Ward 38(1), Midnapur, Paschim Medinipur-721101, West Bengal Vs. Kurkutbandhi SKUS Ltd., Kurkutbandhi, Jagardanga, Paschim Medinipur -711121, West Bengal

ITA No.505/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, KOLKATA16 Oct 2025

The Revenue has raised several grounds of appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Ld. CIT(A)) dated 10.01.2025 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The grounds include the allowance of additional evidence at the

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning