Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–5 of 5 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Haywizz Havelock Island Resort Vs. ITO, Ward-3(4), Port Blair
The assessee, Haywizz Havelock Island Resort, is a firm engaged in the hotel business. It did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2020-21. According to the Assessing Officer, the assessee reported total sales of ₹3,38,58,054…
Gopalchandra Bagui Vs. Assessment Unit
The Department found that the assessee, Gopalchandra Bagui, had sold an immovable property for a consideration of ₹50,14,000/-. The profit from this sale was liable to be taxed under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2015-16. Since…
Royal Fincomm Private Limited Vs. ITO, Ward 4(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Royal Fincomm Private Limited, filed its return of income for the AY 2015-16 declaring total income at Rs.31,57,573/-. The Assessing Officer received information from SEBI indicating large-scale reversal of trades in the stock…
M. A Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-4(1), Kolkata
The assessee, M. A Financial Services Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 declaring a total income of Rs.9,647. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Later, based on inf…
Smt. Sneha Brahma, Legal Representative of Late Shyamal Kumar Brahma Vs. ITO, Ward-2(4), Raiganj
The assessee, an individual, filed his return of income showing a total income of ₹23,090/- for AY 2013-14. The Assessing Officer noted that the assessee had deposited cash amounting to ₹2,98,73,520/- in his bank account and had also receiv…