Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 58 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Anuj Kuchhal vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1)(4)
The assessee filed two appeals for AY 2013-14 against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). In ITA No. 7151/Del/2025, the appeal was dismissed in limine on account of limitation. In ITA No. 7150/Del/2025, the appeal arises out …
M/s.Ashiana Manufacturing India Ltd vs. DCIT
The appeal arises out of the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 07.05.2024 against the order of assessment passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 26.05.2023 by the Assessing Officer, NeF…
Arjun Singh vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Faridabad
The assessee, a farmer in Haryana, sold part of his ancestral agricultural land for ₹1.18 crores in cash and received a cheque for ₹4.66 crores. The cash was deposited in the assessee's bank account, and the sale deed was registered on 11.0…
Nitin Garg Vs Income Tax Officer
The appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre/Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), New Delhi, dated 21.10.2025 arising out of assessment order dated 08.01.2024 passed under section 147 r.w.s…
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle vs. Sterling Agro Industries Limited
The assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2015-16 declaring total income of Rs.22,91,10,290/-. The Revenue initiated proceedings u/s 147 of the Act and issued a notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 27-07-2022. The Assessing Officer comple…
Quetzal Buildtech Private Limited vs. ITO
The assessee, Quetzal Buildtech Private Limited, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 26.08.2025 for A.Y. 2016-17. The assessee raised several grounds challenging the re-assessm…
Dharambir v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi
The assessee, Dharambir, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC dated 25.02.2025 for A.Y. 2014-15. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, including procedural irregularities, invalid n…
Rajiv Garg vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 18.09.2025 for Assessment Year 2014-15. The assessee declared income of Rs.9,76,450/- for A.Y. 2014-15. Reassessment proceedings were initiated, an…
Park View Automotives P. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward 19(3), Delhi
The assessee filed its return of income declaring income at Rs.728/- for AY 2012-13. The assessment was reopened based on information from the Investigation Wing about bogus entries amounting to Rs.1,62,40,000/- and Rs.13,60,000/-. The AO i…
Lambent Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-15(1), New Delhi
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2020-21 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083012489(1), dated…
Sh. Sahil Garg v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43(3), Delhi
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083737185(1), date…
Sh. Sandeep Kumar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Panipat
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2018-19 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083685153(1), dated …
M/s. Srigarv Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2020-21 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30 [in short, the “CIT(A)”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/M/250/2025-26/1083280318(1), dated 03.12.2025 involving proceedings un…
Sh. Ankit Agarwal vs. Income Tax Officer, Noida
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2015-16 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082184649(1), dated …
M/s. Microtrans Infratech Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), New Delhi
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2020-21 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082537530(1), dated …
Krishan Kumar Bansal, Sh. Dinesh Kumar Bansal (Legal Heir of Late Sh. Krishan Kumar Bansal) Vs. Assessing Officer, Ward-46(4), New Delhi
This appeal by assessee is arising out of the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre/ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), New Delhi, dated 05.07.2024 against the assessment order dated 29.09.2021 passed u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, …
Income Tax Officer, Panipat vs. Smt. Rajni Chopra
The Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082622847(1), dated 1…
Sh. Devinder Singh vs. Income Tax Officer, New Delhi
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2019-20, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1080339103(1), date…
Ojas Impex Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer-19(1)
The assessee, Ojas Impex Private Limited, received Rs.50 lakhs from M/s Divyadrishti Merchants Pvt. Ltd., which was treated as unexplained income and added back under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer received in…
Income Tax Officer, Ward-20(1), New Delhi vs. M/s. Precision Agencies Pvt. Ltd.
The instant batch of five cases pertains to the single assessee 'M/s. Precision Agencies Pvt. Ltd.'. The main issue raised is the correctness of the impugned section 68 unexplained cash credits addition and the alleged commission payment th…