Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 161–180 of 870 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
M/s. Bhasin Motors Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT
The assessee, M/s. Bhasin Motors Pvt. Ltd., filed twin appeals against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-23's order dated 11.01.2019. The appeals pertain to proceedings under section 143(3) and 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. …
Satender Kumar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-28(1), New Delhi-110001
The assessee received interest of Rs. 3,97,56,460/- on enhanced compensation from HUDA after the compulsory acquisition of his agricultural land. The assessee claimed the said interest as exempt under Section 10(37) of the Income Tax Act, 1…
Bainu Anand Ahuja v. Income Tax Officer
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18 arises against the Addl./JCIT(A)- 2, Vadodara’s DIN & order No. ITBA/APL/ S/250/2025-26/1079763436(1) dated 20.08.2025, in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Delay of 71 da…
Ramavtar vs Income Tax Officer
The assessee received interest of Rs. 3,97,56,460/- on enhanced compensation from HUDA after the compulsory acquisition of his agricultural land. The assessee claimed this interest as exempt under Section 10(37) of the Income Tax Act. The A…
Abhisar Estates P. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-25, New Delhi dated 29.09.2025, for AY 2017-18. The assessee assails the validity of the notice issued u/s.153C of the Income Tax Act…
Shrish Enterprises Private Limited vs. National e-Assessment Centre
The assessee, Shrish Enterprises Private Limited, received four loan credits totaling Rs.2.33 Cr from various lenders, which were treated as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Assessing Officer. The…
Manoj Saboo vs ITO
The AO had received information from the DDIT (Inv) Unit-4, Investigation Wing that certain credits were made in the Bank account of Shri Amit Gupta. On the basis of this information, the assessment was re-opened. The AO issued notices whic…
DCIT, Central Circle 28, New Delhi vs. Gunjan Gupta, BJ-128, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi – 110 088.
This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] dated 25.07.2025 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. Search action wa…
Charobar Foundation vs. CIT (Exemption)
The assessee, Charobar Foundation, a section 8 company, filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax(Exemption) Delhi rejecting its application for regular registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Inc…
Airports Authority of India Employees Provident Fund Trust vs The Income Tax Department
The assessee, Airports Authority of India Employees Provident Fund Trust, is an approved Provident Fund Trust under Rule 3(1) of part A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee claimed a sum of Rs. 1,14,70,598/- as exempt income under Sect…
Sahara India Limited v. ACIT, Central Circle-I, Lucknow
The instant batch of ten cases involves the single assessee ‘Sahara India Ltd’. The cases revolve around various assessment years and involve issues such as deemed dividend addition under section 2(22)(e), disallowance of administrative and…
Smt. Suman Devi v. Income Tax Officer
The assessee’s twin appeals ITA No.207 & 208/Del/2026 for assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s orders, both dated …
Sh. Sahil Garg v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43(3), Delhi
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083737185(1), date…
Sachin Chemical Udyog vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(5), Meerut
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082290462(1), dated …
Sh. Ramesh Kumar Vishwakarma Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-36(3), New Delhi
The assessee's appeal for assessment year 2011-12 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the 'CIT(A)/NFAC'], Delhi's DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082436686(1), dated …
Sh. Rajesh Sahu Vs. Assessing Officer
The assessee received interest of Rs. 3,97,56,460/- on enhanced compensation from HUDA after the compulsory acquisition of his agricultural land. The Assessing Officer (AO) assessed the interest as exempt under section 10(37) of the Income-…
Sh. Pramod Kumar Tayal vs. DCIT
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2020-21 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/ Addl./JCIT(A)-2, Ahmedabad’s DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1083032617(1), dated 26.11.2025 involving proceedings under sec…
Dhawan Exim Private Ltd. vs. DCIT
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2019-20 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082923198(1), dated …
DCIT, Central Circle-29, New Delhi vs. M/s. Ansh Industries Pvt. Ltd.
This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2013-14, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30 [in short, the 'CIT(A)'], New Delhi’s order dated 25.09.2025 having DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/M/250/2025-26/1081171242(1), involv…
DCIT, Central Circle-32, New Delhi vs. M/s. Sanraj Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.
This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2019-20, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30 [in short, the “CIT(A)”], New Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/M/250/2025-26/1080708559(1), dated 15.09.2025, involving proceedi…