Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–10 of 10 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Ituple Technologies Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT CICRCLE 4(1)
The assessee company filed its return for A.Y. 2017-18 declaring an income of Rs. 3,87,25,850/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny due to non-deduction of TDS on commission, royalty or professional fee paid outside India. The asses…
Smt. Shanti Devi vs. Income Tax Officer
The appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, in Appeal No. NFAC/2018-19/10397076 dated 30.09.2025 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act,…
Raghav Aditya Chits Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT, Circle-13
The appeal is preferred by the assessee against the orders dated 21.02.2018, by Ld. CIT(A)-7, New Delhi, u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2012-13. None appeared from the assessee side, therefore, the Tribunal decided to proce…
Vardhman International v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
The appeals are filed by the assessee against the orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals/ National Faceless Appeal Centre), New Delhi dated 21/01/2025 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 & 2016-17. There is a delay of 171 days in…
Harish Gupta vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Harish Gupta, filed his income tax return after the due date, which was treated as invalid by the Assessing Officer (AO). The AO had information that the assessee deposited a large sum of cash during the demonetization period …
Raj Kumar Sharma vs. ITO, Ward 32 (5)
The assessee, Raj Kumar Sharma, an individual, did not file the return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee had cash deposits of Rs.5,80,…
ITA No. 3164/del/2023 SRS Advertising & marketing Pvt. ltd.
The Assessee, SRS Advertising & Marketing Private Limited, did not file the return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13. An assessment order was passed under sections 147/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 30/11/2019, computing the income …
SH. MUKESH SINGLA & SONS (HUF), VS. DCIT, CIRCLE 28(1)
The appeal by the assessee, SH. MUKESH SINGLA & SONS (HUF), emanates from the order of the NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No. NFAC/2013-14/10433404 dated 05.8.2025. The penalty order under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was passed on…
Poonam vs DCIT
A search action under section 132 was conducted in the case of Shri Net Ram and his associates, including Late Shri Kshitij Lal, the assessee, on 12-13th March, 2019. The assessee, Sh. Kshitij Lal filed his return for A.Y. 2017-18 on 06.03.…
Net Agri Company Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO
This appeal was preferred by Net Agri Company Pvt. Ltd. against the order dated 12.09.2017 passed by the Ld. CIT (A)-6, Delhi for assessment year 2012-13. The assessment order was passed on 27.03.2015 under section 144 of the Income Tax Act…