Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–14 of 14 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Income Tax Officer, Ward-30(5), Delhi vs. Sanjeev Aggarwal
The assessee filed his return of income for A.Y. 2015-16 declaring total income at Rs. 1,73,16,460/-. The AO reopened the assessment based on information that the assessee had sold his immovable property. The assessee filed a revised return…
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle vs. Sterling Agro Industries Limited
The assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2015-16 declaring total income of Rs.22,91,10,290/-. The Revenue initiated proceedings u/s 147 of the Act and issued a notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 27-07-2022. The Assessing Officer comple…
DCIT, Central Circle, Delhi vs. Pooja Mittal
A search and seizure operation was carried out at the premises of Sh. Navneet Dawar, Sh. Anil Narang (Proprietor of M/s. Unique Associates) and Sh. Gurvinder Duggal. During the course of survey proceedings, a photocopy of an agreement to se…
Shri Abhimanyu Nath Vs. The I.T.O
The assessee, Shri Abhimanyu Nath, is engaged in the business of manufacture and export of garments through his proprietorship firm M/s. AZURE. The assessee filed his return of income for the year under consideration on 15.09.2012 declaring…
DCIT, Circle 28(1) vs. Ashwani Khurana
The appeal and Cross Objection were preferred by the Revenue and the Assessee against the order dated 24.07.2024 of the Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) in DIN & Order No : ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1066956257(1) arising out of the …
M/s Khemka Stuart Leisure Ltd. vs ACIT
The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2005-06 arises against the CIT(A)-XXVII, New Delhi’s dated 27.11.2014, in case No. 407/13-14/CIT(A)-XXVII/2014-15, in proceedings u/s 143(3)/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee seeks to re…
Income Tax Officer, Panipat vs. Smt. Rajni Chopra
The Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082622847(1), dated 1…
The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-18, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Vs. M/s Adish Estates Pvt. Ltd., A-46, FF, Double Story, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi-110008.
A search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was conducted in Aerens Group. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information from the Investigation Wing that the assessee had transacted in immovable property. To ascertain the fair …
Jaipal Vs. ITO
The case involves an assessment order passed under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on 22/03/2016, where the Assessing Officer made certain additions and computed the income of the assessee at Rs. 80,56,680/-. The assessee had filed…
ITA No. 234/Del/2025 CO 228/Del/2025 Ashutosh Foods (AY: 2015-16)
The assessee, Ashutosh Foods, filed a return of income on 01.10.2015 declaring income at Rs.56,95,570/- for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessment order was passed on 29.12.2017 at the same income. Subsequently, a notice u/s 148 was is…
ITA Nos. 1882 & 1883/Del/2021 :Asstt. Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13
The assessee, Jagat Agro Commodities Pvt. Ltd., is a partnership firm engaged mainly in the business of trading rice and a small percentage of trading paddy. It filed its return of income on 27.9.2011 declaring a total income of Rs. 6,75,76…
ACIT, Circle 25 (1) vs. Vipul Limited
The assessee, Vipul Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2007-08 declaring an income of Rs.67,58,29,846/-. Subsequently, the assessee revised its return declaring a total income of Rs.71,13,29,746/-. The assessment was co…
Parvinder Kaur Sawhney vs. Pr.CIT, Delhi – 12
The assessee, Parvinder Kaur Sawhney, did not file an income tax return for the Assessment Year 2011-12. A notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was issued, but the assessee did not respond. Consequently, the assessment was c…
INDER DEV GUPTA & Ors. vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 2-DELHI & Ors.
The captioned petitions have been filed impugning notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the respondent who is the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The petitioners contend that the notices and all subsequent …