Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–8 of 8 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
The Hisar Leading Bank Co-op Non-Agri Thrift & Credit Society vs ITO, Ward 1, Hisar
These four appeals by the Assessee are arising out of the respective orders of the Ld. Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi confirming the levy of penalty made by the AO u/s. 271(1)(c) amounting to Rs. 2,09,30,773/-; levy of penalty made u/s. 271F amount…
The Hisar Leading Bank Co-op Non-Agri Thrift & Credit Society vs ITO, Ward 1, Hisar
These three appeals by the Assessee are arising out of the respective orders of the Ld. Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi confirming the levy of penalty made by the AO u/s. 271(1)(b) amounting to Rs. 20,000/-; levy of penalty made u/s. 271(1)(c) amoun…
Mango Media Private Limited vs Income Tax Officer
The appeals are against orders passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre/Ld. CIT(A), New Delhi, for Assessment Years 2011-12 and 2012-13. The assessments were framed by the Assessing Officer under section 147 r.w.s. 144 and penalty orde…
Raghav Aditya Chits Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT, Circle-13
The appeal is preferred by the assessee against the orders dated 21.02.2018, by Ld. CIT(A)-7, New Delhi, u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2012-13. None appeared from the assessee side, therefore, the Tribunal decided to proce…
SH. MUKESH SINGLA & SONS (HUF), VS. DCIT, CIRCLE 28(1)
The appeal by the assessee, SH. MUKESH SINGLA & SONS (HUF), emanates from the order of the NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No. NFAC/2013-14/10433404 dated 05.8.2025. The penalty order under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was passed on…
Lalit Kumar vs ITO Gurugram
The assessee, Shri Lalit Kumar, an agriculturist, did not file his return for Assessment Year 2015-16. Based on information from the department's insight portal regarding cash deposits in his bank account, a notice under section 148 was iss…
Akshay Anand vs AO
The assessee, Akshay Anand, filed a return for A.Y. 2016-17 declaring an income of Rs. 7,88,850/-. The case was re-opened under section 147 to verify unexplained investments and receipts. The assessment was completed at an income of Rs. 66,…
B.H. TRADING CO. vs. DCIT, CC-29, NEW DELHI
These 07 appeals by the Assessee, B.H. TRADING CO., are directed against the separate orders of the Ld. CIT(A)-30, Delhi pertaining to the assessment years 2015-16, 2014-15, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2019-20, 2020-21, and 2018-19. The appeals relat…