Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–8 of 8 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Lava International Ltd. vs Assessment Unit
The assessee company, Lava International Ltd., is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of mobile phones under the brand name 'LAVA'. The company filed its return of income for INR 1,24,57,90,880/-. The case was selected for …
Alfa Modern Mobiles Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO
The assessee company is engaged in the trading of mobile phones and filed its return of income for the A.Y. 2017-18 on 08.11.2017, declaring total income at INR 8,38,870/-. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS on the issue of abn…
Honda Trading Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT/ ACIT
The assessee, Honda Trading Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for AY 2021-22 declaring total income of Rs. 9,78,20,290/-. The case was selected for Complete Scrutiny through CASS. The assessee was primarily engaged in …
Kanpur Development Authority Vs. JCIT Exemption Range Ghaziabad
The assessee, Kanpur Development Authority, is an authority notified under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning (Development and Registration) Act 1973. It is tasked with promoting and securing the development of the area according to plan. The…
M/s. S S Group (P) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4(1)
The relevant facts giving rise to these appeals are that the appellant assessee has claimed depreciation of Rs.30,12,79,256/- and Rs.35,18,94,170/- in AY 2015-16 and 2016-17 respectively on acquired/created goodwill pursuant to the scheme o…
M/s. Shree Raj Mahal Gems Private Limited Vs. DCIT Central Circle – 6
This appeal is filed by the assessee, M/s. Shree Raj Mahal Gems Private Limited, against the order of the Ld.CIT(A)-24, New Delhi dated 17.07.2025 for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, including the…
Harish Bansal vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 36(4), New Delhi
The assessee, Harish Bansal, filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 on 30.10.2017 declaring an income of Rs.8,21,830/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and a notice under section 143(2) dated 16.8.2018 was issued. Fur…
Kreuz Subsea Technologies Pte. Ltd. Vs. ACIT
Kreuz Subsea Technologies Pte. Ltd. filed an appeal against the final assessment order dated 26/03/2021 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation 2(1)(2)-Delhi under Section 143(3) read with Section 1…