Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 41–60 of 123 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Naveen Kurele Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax
The appeal filed by Naveen Kurele, the assessee, is against the order dated 09.07.2024 of the Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-3, Noida, under Sections 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2015-1…
Avtar Instalments Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT
The appellant, Avtar Instalments Pvt. Ltd., is a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) that entered into an unsecured loan transaction amounting to Rs. 40,00,000/- with M/s Sustainable Agro Commercial Finance Ltd. (SAFL) on 14.04.2017. The t…
DHIR SINGH VS. ITO, WARD 1(4)
The assessee, DHIR SINGH, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. NFAC, Delhi dated 07.06.2024, relating to the assessment year 2017-18. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite the issuance of a notice for hearing. The Tribunal…
Cairs Computer Aided Information and Research Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO
The appellant, Cairs Computer Aided Information and Research Services Pvt. Ltd., filed returns of income for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) issued notices under Section 148 of the Income-Tax…
Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(4), Hapur, Uttar Pradesh Vs. Sh. Manoj Kumar Singhal
The case pertains to the assessment year 2014-15, where the Assessing Officer added Rs. 1,84,94,100/- to the assessee's income as unexplained cash credits under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This addition was based on information…
Rajneesh Kumar Singh Vs Income Tax Officer
The case involves four appeals filed by Rajneesh Kumar Singh against the Income Tax Officer for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, and 2016-17. The assessing officer had made section 68 additions for unexplained cash deposits. …
Hi Tec Corporation vs. ITO, Ward 35(1)
These appeals have been filed by the Assessee, Hi Tec Corporation, against the separate orders dated 22.02.2024 & 28.2.2024 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi for the assessment year 2017-18. The orders pertain to a quantum appeal as well…
ITA No. 1358/Del/2024 & CO No. 41/Del/2024
The case involves the reopening of an assessment under sections 147 and 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, Raj Kumar Kedia HUF, filed a cross-objection challenging the validity of the reopening. The Assessing Officer had previou…
Jugal Kishor Pradhan vs ITO
The assessee, Jugal Kishor Pradhan, is in the business of trading iron and steel scrap. He filed his original return of income on 27/08/2012 and subsequently filed a return of income on receipt of notice u/s 148 of the Act declaring a total…
Shahjad vs ITO
The appeal was filed by the assessee, Shahjad, against the First Appellate order dated 28.03.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, arising from the assessment order dated 24.03.2022. The …
Surender Singh vs ITO
This appeal is filed by Surender Singh against the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi dated 26.12.2018 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee raised several grounds, but only ground no.4 was pressed at the hearing. The case wa…
DCIT, Circle-14(1), New Delhi Vs. M/s. Kanodia Technoplast Pvt. Ltd
The appeal in ITA No. 5457/Del/2015 filed by the revenue and CO No. 54/Del/2016 filed by the assessee arises out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-V, Delhi in Appeal No. 0099/2013-14 dated 05.06.2015 against the order…
Pawan Kumar Vs Income Tax Officer
This appeal by Pawan Kumar for Assessment Year 2013-14 arises against the order of the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 29.11.2023, in proceedings under sections 147 and 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The learned counsel for the assessee submitte…
FOOD RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS CENTRE vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), NEW DELHI
The assessee, FOOD RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS CENTRE, did not file its return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 in compliance with a notice under section 148 of the Act. The assessee submitted that its name was changed in August 2008 to …
Krishan Kumar vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department
The assessee, Krishan Kumar, filed appeals against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 29.04.2024 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The Assessing Officer had pass…
SHREEJI INFRA PROJECTS VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER/ASSESSMENT UNIT, NEW DELHI
The assessee, SHREEJI INFRA PROJECTS, sold immovable property worth Rs. 87,75,000/- but did not file an income tax return under section 139(1) of the Act nor offered the financial transactions for taxation. Consequently, an action under sec…
MONIKA INDUSTRIES VS. ITO, WARD 56(3)
The assessee, MONIKA INDUSTRIES, filed a return of income on 30.10.2018 declaring a total income of Rs. 2,81,810/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) accepted the returned income and passed an order on 29.12.2023 under sections 147, 144, and 144B …
AZAD SINGH VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(1), SAHARANPUR UP
The assessee, Azad Singh, did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2012-13. During the year, he made cash deposits totaling Rs. 27,45,500/- into his savings bank account at Punjab National Bank, Saharanpur. Based on these dep…
Sanjay vs. ITO, Ward-2
The assessee, Sanjay, deposited cash of Rs. 28,50,000/- in his bank account maintained with Corporation Bank, Rohtak during the Assessment Year 2012-13. Since the assessee failed to file the return of income under section 139(1), he was req…
Rahul Rastogi vs. ACIT
Rahul Rastogi, the assessee, filed a return declaring an income of Rs.18,24,660/- for the assessment year 2017-18. The case was selected for reopening, and a notice for reopening was issued on 31.03.2021. The reopening was based on an alleg…