Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 110 of 10 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Satish Batra Vs. ACIT

ITA No. 3859/ DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal25 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

The appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 15.04.2025 for AY 2015-16. The assessee submitted that the notice u/s 148 of the Income Ta

Read summary

WAW Digitrade Private Limited Vs. AO, Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi

ITA No.6482/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench18 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

The assessee's case was reopened under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by issuing a notice under section 148 on 28.06.2021. The notice was deemed to have been issued under section 148A(b) and information was supplied to the assessee

Read summary

Heritage Lamps vs. ITO

ITA Nos. 393 to 396/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench18 Feb 2026AY 2014-15, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2019-20

The assessee, Heritage Lamps, filed returns of income for various assessment years. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and reassessment proceedings were initiated. The assessee filed appeals against the rea

Read summary

Nishant Narang Vs. Income Tax Office, Ward-36(1)

आअसं.210/धिल्ली /2026 (धि.ि. 2013-14)Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench16 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

The assessee, Nishant Narang, has appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 26.11.2025, for AY 2013-14. The assessee has assailed the assessment proceedings

Read summary

Kanti Prasad Finvest Private Limited vs ITO

ITAs No.2927 & 2928/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench13 Feb 2026AY 2013-14 & 2015-16

The facts leading to the case is that the first notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued on 28.06.2021 and as per TOLA the extended limitation period was dated 30.06.2021. Therefore, the surviving period was three days from 28.06.2021

Read summary

K&S Fincon Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-14(1), Delhi

ITA No.6556/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench11 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

The assessee filed the return of income declaring income of Rs.29,820/- on 26-10-2013 for A.Y.2013-14. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act on 13-03-2014. The case was selected for scrutiny u/s 143(3) of the Act and Assessment ord

Read summary

Mrs. Krishna Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-36(1), New Delhi-110001

ITA No. 166/Del/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘SMC’, New Delhi10 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18 arises against the C IT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082534866(1) dated 12.11.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The first and foremost is

Read summary

Ravindra Kumar Gupta vs. DCIT, Circle 5(3)(1)

ITA No.2760/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'B' BENCH, DELHI9 Jan 2026

The assessee, Ravindra Kumar Gupta, filed a return of income declaring an income of Rs. 1,10,90,564/- for the assessment year 2018-19. During the scrutiny assessment, the case was picked up for further examination, and it was subsequently r

Read summary

M/s LNG Amaethon LLP Vs CIT(A)/NFAC/ITO

ITA No. 5302/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI14 Jan 2026

This appeal arises from the proceedings under section 147 read with section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The main issue pertains to the validity of section 148 proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer beyond the prescribed period

Read summary

Amit Yadav Vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No.7002/DEL/2025 (A.Y.2020-21)Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench2 Jan 2026

The assessee, Amit Yadav, is a salaried employee who jointly purchased a residential unit with his mother, Smt. Vidhya Wati Yadav, from M/s. Bhutani Infra Group & Associates. The payment for the unit was made by account payee cheque. Howeve

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning