Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–12 of 12 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Harish Chander Sehgal vs ITO
The assessee filed his return of income declaring an income of Rs.3,89,310/-. The case for the A.Y. 2017-18 was selected for scrutiny and assessment u/s 143(3) was completed vide order dated 30/12/2019 at Rs.1,62,96,190/-. The A.O made addi…
ITO vs M/s Ranyal Traders Pvt. Ltd.
The assessee company, incorporated on 06.11.1991, is engaged in trade of import-export and supply of clothing, hosiery, readymade garments, fabrics, textiles, trading and allied activities under the trade name of 'Ranyal Impex International…
SANCHAY JAIN vs. DCIT, CC-30, NEW DELHI
Assessee filed his return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act declaring income of Rs. 3,76,780/- on 28.12.2020. A search u/s. 132A of the Act was initiated on 7.2.2020 by the Investigation Wing, New Delhi SST-2 (Static Surveillance team) and f…
Hemant Kumar, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Kasturi Jewellers P. Ltd.
The Revenue appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, which deleted an addition of Rs.14,52,23,691/- made under section 68 read with section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act,…
Zeliant Corp vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 36(1), Delhi
The appellant is a partnership firm coming into existence w.e.f. 31.07.2025 through a deed of partnership executed on that date between two partners Sh. Apurv Jain and Sh. Shlshu Sharma. The assessee made cash deposits of Rs. 67,25,000/- du…
Jaideep Khanduja vs Income Tax Officer
The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18 arises against the Addl./JCIT( A)-10, Mumbai’s DIN & order No. ITBA/APL/ S/250/2025-26/1082052827(1) dated 28.10.2025, in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The lower author…
Chander Bhan Yogesh Kumar Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-10
The assessment for AY 2018-19 in the case of assessee was reopened on the basis of information received that the assessee was one of the beneficiaries of fake claim of input tax credit in lieu of commission. The case of Revenue is that the …
ITA No. 955/Del/2024
The assessee, SMS Trading Co., is a partnership firm engaged as a consignment sales agent for M/s Dharam Pal Satya Pal Ltd., selling Paan Masala and other tobacco products under the brand name Rajnigandha and others in retail. A survey unde…
PRAHLAD SINGH, VS. PCIT, ROHTAK
The assessee, Prahlad Singh, e-filed his return of income for the assessment year 2020-21 declaring a total income of Rs. 1,48,050/- including net agricultural income of Rs. 34,01,132/-. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Offi…
New Bhola Sons Jewellers Vs Income Tax Officer
The assessee, New Bhola Sons Jewellers, a firm engaged in the jewellery business, had cash deposits amounting to Rs.73,30,000/- during demonetization. The assessee claimed that these deposits were from cash in hand in the jewellery business…
ITO, Delhi vs. Shann Jewellers
During the assessment proceedings for the financial year 2016-17, the Assessing Officer (AO) noticed repayments of unsecured loans and unexplained cash deposits during the demonetization period. The AO required the assessee to explain these…
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-34(1), Civic Centre, E-2 Block, 2nd Floor, New Delhi Vs. Raj Bajwa, Ashok Vihar, 390, SFS Flats, Phase-IV, New Delhi
The respondent assessee, Raj Bajwa, filed his Income Tax Return on 28.02.2018 declaring income of Rs.23,23,700/-. The case was picked up for limited scrutiny for verification of cash deposits made in the bank account in the FY 2016-17 inclu…