Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 110 of 10 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Krishan Kumar vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department

ITA No.4283/DEL/2024 & ITA No.4284/DEL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench12 Mar 2025

The assessee, Krishan Kumar, filed appeals against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 29.04.2024 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The Assessing Officer had pass

Read summary

Rajesh Gupta Vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No.5293/DEL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH, ‘E’: NEW DELHI14 Jan 2026

This appeal is filed by the assessee, Rajesh Gupta, against the order dated 10.06.2025 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi, arising out of the assessment order dated 07.09.2021 pass

Read summary

Rajeev Kumar Mittal Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Hisar

ITA No.5229/DEL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI7 Jan 2026

The appellant/assessee, Rajeev Kumar Mittal, is a non-ITR filer. During the financial year 2017-18, relevant to assessment year 2018-19, the assessee made cash withdrawals of Rs. 8,72,89,905/- from his Corporation Bank account. No return of

Read summary

Smt. Urmila Dhelia Vs ITO, Ward -23(3)(1)

I.T.A. No. 4204/Mum/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'F' BENCH, MUMBAI20 Jan 2026

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee, Smt. Urmila Dhelia, challenging the impugned order dated 04.06.2025 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) / CIT(A) for the asses

Read summary

Mr. Akil Abbas Rassai Vs. DCIT Circle-22(1)

ITA No. 7622/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Mumbai27 Jan 2026

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 16.10.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, whereby the penalty of Rs.16,05,922/- levied under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for

Read summary

Manisha Devnani Vs. INT Tax Ward 2(1)(1)

ITA No. 344/MUM/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench23 Jan 2026

This appeal was filed by Manisha Devnani against the assessment order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the Income-tax Officer (International Taxation), Ward 1(1), Mumbai, under section 147 read with section 144C(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, fo

Read summary

Kalna Regulated Market Committee vs. ITO, Ward-1(1), Burdwan

ITA Nos.1346 to 1348/Kol/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Kolkata18 Nov 2025

The assessee, Kalna Regulated Market Committee, did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2018-19. The case was reopened under section 147 based on information that the assessee had deposited cash amounting to Rs. 2,09,88,370/

Read summary

Satupur Samabay Unnayan Samity Ltd vs. ITO, Ward-27(3), Haldia

ITA No.383/Kol/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Kolkata12 Dec 2025

The assessee, Satupur Samabay Unnayan Samity Ltd, did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2018-19. The case was reopened by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on 29.03.2022. In response to the not

Read summary

Dilip Kumar Pramanik Vs. I.T.O., Ward-25(1), Kolkata

ITA Nos.: 1579, 1580 & 1581/KOL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata ‘A’ Bench, Kolkata9 Dec 2025

The assessee, Dilip Kumar Pramanik, filed his return of income for AY 2018-19 on 25.07.2018 declaring a total income of ₹30,61,060/-. It was noticed that the assessee had sold a residential property on 27.07.2017 amounting to ₹52,00,000/-,

Read summary

Terai Fruits Company Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Siliguri

I.T.A. No.: 2099/KOL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata ‘B’ Bench, Kolkata14 Jan 2025

The case of the assessee, Terai Fruits Company, was selected for assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the return of income for the assessment year 2018-19 was not filed. The assessee had significant cash deposits and

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning