Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–17 of 17 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Nagpal vs Income Tax Officer
The assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2018-19 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi's order dated 16.02.2024. The delay of 617 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The main issue is the validity of section 148 proceedings where the As…
Sanjay Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee, Sanjay Kumar, started a small business of sale of confectionery items. He filed his return of income for AY 2016-17 u/s.44AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 declaring total income of Rs.2,77,560/-. For the next two assessment year…
Sh. Sandeep Kumar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Panipat
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2018-19 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083685153(1), dated …
Krishan Kumar vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department
The assessee, Krishan Kumar, filed appeals against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 29.04.2024 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The Assessing Officer had pass…
MONIKA INDUSTRIES VS. ITO, WARD 56(3)
The assessee, MONIKA INDUSTRIES, filed a return of income on 30.10.2018 declaring a total income of Rs. 2,81,810/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) accepted the returned income and passed an order on 29.12.2023 under sections 147, 144, and 144B …
M/s T. C. Agro Food Industries Vs Income Tax Officer
The case involves two appeals by M/s T. C. Agro Food Industries against the orders of the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi and the PCIT, Rohtak for Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessing authority had framed section 147 r.w.s. 144B assessment treating ce…
Reshma Harbakhsh Singh through Legal Heir Vikaramaditya Singh VS DCIT
The assessee, Ms. Reshma Harbakhsh Singh, did not file her return for the Assessment Year 2018-19. Based on information regarding the sale of immovable property, a notice under Section 148 was issued to her on 04.04.2022 after obtaining pri…
Rajput Mohammadmuntasim Tashbihuddin Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-28(1), New Delhi
The assessee, Rajput Mohammadmuntasim Tashbihuddin, received foreign remittances amounting to Rs. 1,58,83,009/- in his bank account with J & K Bank during F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y 2018-19. He claimed to have received an export order for…
NAVEEN SONI Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER
The assessee's appeal for assessment year 2018-19 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN & Order No: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1080920346(1), dated 19…
M/S JHS Sevendgaard Laboratories Ltd. Vs. DCIT
The Assessee, M/S JHS Sevendgaard Laboratories Ltd., was engaged in the business of manufacturing toothpaste and brushes for the year under consideration. The case of the Assessee was reopened, and an assessment order was passed on 31/03/20…
Manisha Devnani Vs. INT Tax Ward 2(1)(1)
This appeal was filed by Manisha Devnani against the assessment order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the Income-tax Officer (International Taxation), Ward 1(1), Mumbai, under section 147 read with section 144C(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, fo…
LinkedIn Technology Information Pvt Ltd Vs. The P.C.I.T
The assessee, LinkedIn Technology Information Pvt Ltd, is engaged in providing marketing and customer support services to LinkedIn Singapore Pte Ltd and contract research and development services to LinkedIn Ireland Unlimited Company. The a…
Kalna Regulated Market Committee vs. ITO, Ward-1(1), Burdwan
The assessee, Kalna Regulated Market Committee, did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2018-19. The case was reopened under section 147 based on information that the assessee had deposited cash amounting to Rs. 2,09,88,370/…
Dilip Kumar Pramanik Vs. I.T.O., Ward-25(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Dilip Kumar Pramanik, filed his return of income for AY 2018-19 on 25.07.2018 declaring a total income of ₹30,61,060/-. It was noticed that the assessee had sold a residential property on 27.07.2017 amounting to ₹52,00,000/-, …
Abhishek Kumar Prasad vs. ITO, Ward-1(1), Siliguri
The assessee, Abhishek Kumar Prasad, is an individual who disclosed a turnover of Rs.52,14,340/- in his tax audit report and ITR for the assessment year 2018-19. However, the total deposits in his bank account amounted to Rs.1,06,74,737/-. …
People Tree Chits Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward- 5(2)(1)
The case involves People Tree Chits Pvt. Ltd., which was found to have made cash withdrawals amounting to Rs. 1,28,28,590/- and deposited a significant amount of cash (Rs. 1,05,59,590/-) into its bank account without substantiating the sour…
Ramgiri Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1)
The assessee, a housewife and non-filer, received compensation from the compulsory acquisition of her land by State Government Authorities. She invested Rs.58,51,071/- from this compensation in a Term Deposit, the interest of which was subj…