Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 110 of 10 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Sanjay Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

आअसं.7038/धिल्ली /2025(नि.व. 2018-19)Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'C'10 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

The assessee, Sanjay Kumar, started a small business of sale of confectionery items. He filed his return of income for AY 2016-17 u/s.44AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 declaring total income of Rs.2,77,560/-. For the next two assessment year

Read summary

Krishan Kumar vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department

ITA No.4283/DEL/2024 & ITA No.4284/DEL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench12 Mar 2025

The assessee, Krishan Kumar, filed appeals against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 29.04.2024 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The Assessing Officer had pass

Read summary

MONIKA INDUSTRIES VS. ITO, WARD 56(3)

ITA No. 4311/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ : NEW DELHI)10 Mar 2025

The assessee, MONIKA INDUSTRIES, filed a return of income on 30.10.2018 declaring a total income of Rs. 2,81,810/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) accepted the returned income and passed an order on 29.12.2023 under sections 147, 144, and 144B

Read summary

M/s T. C. Agro Food Industries Vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 5719/Del/2024 & ITA No. 3341/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘E’, New Delhi9 Jan 2026

The case involves two appeals by M/s T. C. Agro Food Industries against the orders of the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi and the PCIT, Rohtak for Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessing authority had framed section 147 r.w.s. 144B assessment treating ce

Read summary

NAVEEN SONI Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA No.8942/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI28 Jan 2026

The assessee's appeal for assessment year 2018-19 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN & Order No: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1080920346(1), dated 19

Read summary

M/S JHS Sevendgaard Laboratories Ltd. Vs. DCIT

ITA No. 3454/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI (DELHI BENCH ‘E’ NEW DELHI)7 Jan 2026

The Assessee, M/S JHS Sevendgaard Laboratories Ltd., was engaged in the business of manufacturing toothpaste and brushes for the year under consideration. The case of the Assessee was reopened, and an assessment order was passed on 31/03/20

Read summary

Mala Singh Vs. Income Tax Officer, Kolkata

ITA No.: 1317/KOL/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA28 Jan 2026

The assessee, Mala Singh, proprietor of M/s. Shiv Shakti Enterprise, filed her return of income for AY 2018-19 declaring a total income of ₹15,73,144/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection (CASS) to

Read summary

M/s Neeta Developer Vs. ITO/ NFAC, Delhi

I.T.A. No. 7316/Mum/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI19 Jan 2026

The appeal is preferred by M/s Neeta Developer against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) / National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 19.09.2025 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The original assessment order was passed

Read summary

Debasish Banerjee vs. ITO, Ward-44(1), Kolkata

ITA No.1047/Kol/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Kolkata27 Oct 2025

The assessee, Debasish Banerjee, filed his return of income declaring a total income of Rs.2,40,660/- for the assessment year 2018-19. The case was selected for limited scrutiny regarding the sale consideration reported in the capital gain

Read summary

Abhishek Kumar Prasad vs. ITO, Ward-1(1), Siliguri

ITA No.2044/Kol/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Kolkata23 Dec 2025

The assessee, Abhishek Kumar Prasad, is an individual who disclosed a turnover of Rs.52,14,340/- in his tax audit report and ITR for the assessment year 2018-19. However, the total deposits in his bank account amounted to Rs.1,06,74,737/-.

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning