Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–16 of 16 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Manjeet Singh vs ITO
The assessee is engaged in manufacturing of quality fasteners, screw, rivets, nuts, washers and bolts since 2010 serving the needs of Indian industries. The assessee filed its return of income on 31.10.2018, declaring a total income of Rs. …
Nawab Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO
The AO noted that the assessee had not filed its original return of income. The case was re-opened vide notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 29.03.2022 inter alia on the ground of cash deposit of Rs. 3,63,55,120/- in the bank account of the asse…
ITA No.1615/KOL/2024
The assessee, Sawansukha Jewellers Private Limited, filed its return of income on 30.10.2018 declaring a total income of ₹29,74,75,300/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and the assessment was framed under section 143(3) of the Act, asse…
Baba Global Ltd. Vs DCIT
The case pertains to the assessment year 2018-19. Baba Global Ltd. appealed against the order of CIT(A)-30, New Delhi, which upheld an addition of Rs. 19,98,738/- as bogus interest expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. …
Ashish Gupta Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-8, New Delhi
The relevant facts giving rise to this appeal are that the search operations were carried out on the assessee along with Sanjay Singhal Group of cases on 15.11.2017. During the search operations, the cash of Rs.19,00,000/- was seized from t…
M/s T. C. Agro Food Industries Vs Income Tax Officer
The case involves two appeals by M/s T. C. Agro Food Industries against the orders of the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi and the PCIT, Rohtak for Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessing authority had framed section 147 r.w.s. 144B assessment treating ce…
Rajput Mohammadmuntasim Tashbihuddin Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-28(1), New Delhi
The assessee, Rajput Mohammadmuntasim Tashbihuddin, received foreign remittances amounting to Rs. 1,58,83,009/- in his bank account with J & K Bank during F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y 2018-19. He claimed to have received an export order for…
Manoj Kumar vs ITO
The assessee, Manoj Kumar, filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2018-19 declaring a total income of INR 5,12,820/-. The case was re-opened by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the…
C.R. Investments Vs. ACIT, Circle-28(1), Delhi
The case pertains to the assessment year 2018-19, where the assessee, C.R. Investments, appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [CIT(A)/NFAC], Delhi. The CIT(A)/NFAC had upheld …
AVR Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Ward-14(1), Kolkata
The assessee, AVR Hotels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd., is a Private Limited Company engaged in trading and hotel operations. It filed its return of income for A.Y. 2018–19 declaring a total income of ₹9,40,973. The case was selected for scrutiny, an…
Tanuj Pahilaj Lalwani vs Income Tax Officer Ward 27(3)(1)
The assessee, Tanuj Pahilaj Lalwani, is a non-filer of income-tax returns. He, along with his father, purchased a flat for Rs.1.50 crore on 08.09.2017. The case was reopened based on information from the Sub-Registrar, Mumbai. The assessee …
Manisha Devnani Vs. INT Tax Ward 2(1)(1)
This appeal was filed by Manisha Devnani against the assessment order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the Income-tax Officer (International Taxation), Ward 1(1), Mumbai, under section 147 read with section 144C(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, fo…
Santlal Enterprise Vs. ITO, Ward 1(1)
The assessee, Santlal Enterprise, filed a return of income on 08.06.2018 declaring total income at ₹nil. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS, and the assessee complied with statutory notices by providing various details and eviden…
M/s. Ankalan Web Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT
The assessee company, M/s. Ankalan Web Solutions Pvt. Ltd., was selected for limited scrutiny assessment under the e-assessment scheme, 2019, on the issue of 'Investment in intangible assets'. During the assessment proceedings, the assessee…
Ramgiri Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1)
The assessee, a housewife and non-filer, received compensation from the compulsory acquisition of her land by State Government Authorities. She invested Rs.58,51,071/- from this compensation in a Term Deposit, the interest of which was subj…
Kishan Lal Vs. The NFAC
The assessee, Kishan Lal, was robbed on the highway and an addition of Rs 50,00,000 was made on account of alleged unexplained cash. The robbers were caught with Rs 30,38,000, and they admitted having looted Rs 50,00,000. Kishan Lal verifie…