Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–7 of 7 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Vale India (P) Ltd. vs. JCIT, Range-27, New Delhi
The assessee company was incorporated in India on 10.10.2005 for exploration and mining activities. It became a coal marketing support office of its group company in January 2014 and exited its exploration business in December 2013. For the…
Inder Mohan Singh Saluja Vs. ITO
The assessee, Inder Mohan Singh Saluja, filed his income tax return for the Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring a net taxable income of Rs. 13,02,480/-. A survey operation under section 133A of the Income Tax Act was conducted at his business…
Income Tax Officer, Civic Centre, New Delhi Vs. Sh. Naveen Arora
The assessee, Sh. Naveen Arora, is engaged in the business of console agents for international freight forwarding under the proprietorship concern Pawansoot Freight Solutions. For the Assessment Year 2017-18, an ex-parte assessment order wa…
Gargi Overseas Pvt. Ltd Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-10(1), Delhi
The case involves Gargi Overseas Pvt. Ltd, which is engaged in the purchase and sale of bullion and commodities like rice. The assessee had made purchases from M/s. Mahavir Prasad Suresh Kumar and M/s. Umesh Kumar Vivek Kumar, totaling Rs. …
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata vs. Vivek Gupta
The case involves an appeal by the revenue and a cross objection by the assessee, Vivek Gupta, against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata. The revenue contested the deletion of an addition of Rs. 25,00…
Vinod Bhandari vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The present appeal filed by Vinod Bhandari arises from an order dated 24.01.2025 passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata. The issue raised by the assessee is against …
M/s. Sanjay Enterprises Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Raichur
The assessee, M/s. Sanjay Enterprises, had not filed its return of income. Based on information available in the AIMS module of the ITBA, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee had deposited cash of Rs. 7,10,000/- in the savings…