Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–9 of 9 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Hi Tec Corporation vs. ITO, Ward 35(1)
These appeals have been filed by the Assessee, Hi Tec Corporation, against the separate orders dated 22.02.2024 & 28.2.2024 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi for the assessment year 2017-18. The orders pertain to a quantum appeal as well…
Raja Paints India Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee, Raja Paints India Private Limited, is contesting an ad-hoc addition of Rs.3,05,61,134/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of Gross Profit for Assessment Year 2017-18. A survey under section 133A was conducted on th…
M/s. R.M. Bhuther and Co. Vs. National Faceless Appeal Centre
The assessee, M/s. R.M. Bhuther and Co., a partnership firm, filed its original return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring total income at Rs.Nil. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Th…
Saha Medi Services Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Ward-1(1), Kolkata
These are two appeals filed by the assessee against the orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] in appeal nos.NFAC/2016-17/10139952 & NFAC/2016-17/1039953 both dated 11.06.2024 for assessment …
Kamalpur Jotekanuragarh S K U S Limited Vs. ACIT, Circle-38, Medinipur
The assessee is a Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society registered under the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 2006. It is engaged in the business of fertilizers, seeds, providing KCC loans to members, SHG loans, and banking …
Kanta Bhatia Legal Heir of Pramod Kumar Bhatia, M/s. P.K. Steels vs. DCIT
The assessee, Kanta Bhatia, legal heir of Pramod Kumar Bhatia, M/s. P.K. Steels, underwent a search and seizure action under section 132 of the Income Tax Act on 05.10.2017. Following this, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridaba…
ANITA KUMARI SADH VS. ITO, WARD 58(4), NEW DELHI
The assessee, Anita Kumari Sadh, filed her return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 on 5th February 2018, declaring a total income of Rs. 3,36,270/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 6,98,000/- to her income, citin…
Kreuz Subsea Technologies Pte. Ltd. Vs. ACIT
Kreuz Subsea Technologies Pte. Ltd. filed an appeal against the final assessment order dated 26/03/2021 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation 2(1)(2)-Delhi under Section 143(3) read with Section 1…
M/s. Nihal Projects Vs. ITO
The assessee, M/s. Nihal Projects, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 on 03.11.2017, declaring a total taxable income of Rs. 3,28,650/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and notices under section 143(2) of the Inc…