Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–6 of 6 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Alfa Modern Mobiles Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO
The assessee company is engaged in the trading of mobile phones and filed its return of income for the A.Y. 2017-18 on 08.11.2017, declaring total income at INR 8,38,870/-. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS on the issue of abn…
Harish Bansal vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 36(4), New Delhi
The assessee, Harish Bansal, filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 on 30.10.2017 declaring an income of Rs.8,21,830/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and a notice under section 143(2) dated 16.8.2018 was issued. Fur…
Kreuz Subsea Technologies Pte. Ltd. Vs. ACIT
Kreuz Subsea Technologies Pte. Ltd. filed an appeal against the final assessment order dated 26/03/2021 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation 2(1)(2)-Delhi under Section 143(3) read with Section 1…
Maruti Multichem Pvt. Ltd. vs. The DCIT
The assessee, Maruti Multichem Pvt. Ltd., filed its Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring a total income of Rs. 1,79,06,740/-. The case was reopened on the basis that the assessee had received bogus loans and advances f…
M/s. Nihal Projects Vs. ITO
The assessee, M/s. Nihal Projects, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 on 03.11.2017, declaring a total taxable income of Rs. 3,28,650/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and notices under section 143(2) of the Inc…
Sri.Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith vs. The Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Sri.Veeranna Murthy Raghavendra Deekshith, is a wholesale and retail distributor of Cadbury products in North Bangalore. For the assessment year 2017-18, he declared a taxable income of Rs.10,06,240/-. His income comprised a l…