Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–19 of 19 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Puran Store vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-43(1)
The assessee, Puran Store, was issued a notice under section 148A(b) seeking explanation for cash deposits of Rs 1,58,80,000/-. The assessee furnished an explanation stating the deposits were from cash sales and matched VAT returns. The Ass…
Sh. Sahil Garg v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43(3), Delhi
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083737185(1), date…
Krishan Kumar Bansal, Sh. Dinesh Kumar Bansal (Legal Heir of Late Sh. Krishan Kumar Bansal) Vs. Assessing Officer, Ward-46(4), New Delhi
This appeal by assessee is arising out of the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre/ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), New Delhi, dated 05.07.2024 against the assessment order dated 29.09.2021 passed u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, …
Income Tax Officer, Panipat vs. Smt. Rajni Chopra
The Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082622847(1), dated 1…
Uniseven Engineering & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Circle-7(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Uniseven Engineering & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., had an initial assessment order passed under section 147 read with section 144B dated 24.03.2022, where an addition was made to the returned income and tax was charged at 30%. S…
Sandip Kumar Keshari Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1)
The assessee, Sandip Kumar Keshari, did not file any return of income for the assessment year 2017-18. The proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act were initiated by issuing a notice under section 148 on 24.03.2021. The case was …
ITA No. 2309/KOL/2024 & CO No. 4/KOL/2025
The assessee, M/s Delightful Estate Developers LLP, filed a return of income on 21.07.2017 declaring total income at ₹ nil. A search action conducted on 25.05.2018 in the case of Banka Group of companies revealed that Mukesh Banka and assoc…
Avtar Instalments Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT
The appellant, Avtar Instalments Pvt. Ltd., is a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) that entered into an unsecured loan transaction amounting to Rs. 40,00,000/- with M/s Sustainable Agro Commercial Finance Ltd. (SAFL) on 14.04.2017. The t…
DHIR SINGH VS. ITO, WARD 1(4)
The assessee, DHIR SINGH, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. NFAC, Delhi dated 07.06.2024, relating to the assessment year 2017-18. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite the issuance of a notice for hearing. The Tribunal…
Hi Tec Corporation vs. ITO, Ward 35(1)
These appeals have been filed by the Assessee, Hi Tec Corporation, against the separate orders dated 22.02.2024 & 28.2.2024 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi for the assessment year 2017-18. The orders pertain to a quantum appeal as well…
Rahul Rastogi vs. ACIT
Rahul Rastogi, the assessee, filed a return declaring an income of Rs.18,24,660/- for the assessment year 2017-18. The case was selected for reopening, and a notice for reopening was issued on 31.03.2021. The reopening was based on an alleg…
ITA No.8814/Del/2025
This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN & Order No: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083347971(1), dated 0…
Ankur Ramesh Vahi vs. ITO
This appeal is filed by the Assessee, Ankur Ramesh Vahi, against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi, dated 3.10.2025, in appeal No. NFAC/2016-17/10514292 for Assessmen…
Bengal Distribution House vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Malda
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee, Bengal Distribution House, for the assessment year 2017-18 against the order dated 31.07.2025 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] passed under s…
Balkrishna Pandurang Patil vs. Ward No. 10 (3) (1)
The case involves an appeal by Balkrishna Pandurang Patil against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)/Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year …
Abdul Salam Mohamed Yasin vs. DCIT, Circle 17(1), Mumbai
The appeal was filed by the assessee, Abdul Salam Mohamed Yasin, against the order dated 13.10.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, for the quantum of assessment framed under section 147 read with section 144 of the In…
M/s. Sanjay Enterprises Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Raichur
The assessee, M/s. Sanjay Enterprises, had not filed its return of income. Based on information available in the AIMS module of the ITBA, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee had deposited cash of Rs. 7,10,000/- in the savings…
ITA No. 3497/Del/2023 : Asstt. Year: 2017-18
The Revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18 arises against the CIT(A)-29, New Delhi’s order in case No. CIT(A), Delhi-29/10627/2016-17 dated 19.09.2023, in proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal involves …
Maruti Multichem Pvt. Ltd. vs. The DCIT
The assessee, Maruti Multichem Pvt. Ltd., filed its Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 declaring a total income of Rs. 1,79,06,740/-. The case was reopened on the basis that the assessee had received bogus loans and advances f…