Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 15 of 5 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Rahul Rastogi vs. ACIT

ITA No.845/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Benches7 Mar 2025

Rahul Rastogi, the assessee, filed a return declaring an income of Rs.18,24,660/- for the assessment year 2017-18. The case was selected for reopening, and a notice for reopening was issued on 31.03.2021. The reopening was based on an alleg

Read summary

ITA No.8814/Del/2025

8814/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH27 Jan 2026

This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN & Order No: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083347971(1), dated 0

Read summary

Ankur Ramesh Vahi vs. ITO

ITA No.7535/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘E’23 Jan 2026

This appeal is filed by the Assessee, Ankur Ramesh Vahi, against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi, dated 3.10.2025, in appeal No. NFAC/2016-17/10514292 for Assessmen

Read summary

Abdul Salam Mohamed Yasin vs. DCIT, Circle 17(1), Mumbai

ITA No.7502/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Mumbai21 Jan 2026

The appeal was filed by the assessee, Abdul Salam Mohamed Yasin, against the order dated 13.10.2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, for the quantum of assessment framed under section 147 read with section 144 of the In

Read summary

M/s. Sanjay Enterprises Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Raichur

ITA No. 2026/Bang/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE29 Jan 2025

The assessee, M/s. Sanjay Enterprises, had not filed its return of income. Based on information available in the AIMS module of the ITBA, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee had deposited cash of Rs. 7,10,000/- in the savings

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning