Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 110 of 10 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

DHIR SINGH VS. ITO, WARD 1(4)

ITA NO. 3553/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH27 Mar 2025

The assessee, DHIR SINGH, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. NFAC, Delhi dated 07.06.2024, relating to the assessment year 2017-18. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite the issuance of a notice for hearing. The Tribunal

Read summary

Harish Gupta vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No.1189/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, ‘B’: New Delhi24 Mar 2025

The assessee, Harish Gupta, filed his income tax return after the due date, which was treated as invalid by the Assessing Officer (AO). The AO had information that the assessee deposited a large sum of cash during the demonetization period

Read summary

Hi Tec Corporation vs. ITO, Ward 35(1)

ITA Nos. 2500 & 2499/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench ‘B’, New Delhi)20 Mar 2025

These appeals have been filed by the Assessee, Hi Tec Corporation, against the separate orders dated 22.02.2024 & 28.2.2024 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi for the assessment year 2017-18. The orders pertain to a quantum appeal as well

Read summary

Vijay Garg Vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA Nos.364/D/2024THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘E’ BENCH, DELHI12 Mar 2025

The instant appeal was filed by the assessee, Vijay Garg, against the order dated 22.12.2023 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which arose out of the order dated 26.12.2019 passed under section 144 of the Act for

Read summary

Sushila Devi Vs. Ld. CIT(A)

ITA No. 828/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI (DELHI BENCH ‘G’ NEW DELHI)7 Mar 2025

The present appeal is filed by Joginder Singh Pahwa, the legal heir of Sushila Devi, challenging the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 13/09/2023 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. Sushila Devi died on 20/02/2020, and th

Read summary

Ankur Ramesh Vahi vs. ITO

ITA No.7535/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘E’23 Jan 2026

This appeal is filed by the Assessee, Ankur Ramesh Vahi, against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi, dated 3.10.2025, in appeal No. NFAC/2016-17/10514292 for Assessmen

Read summary

Bengal Distribution House vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Malda

ITA No.2103/Kol/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Kolkata21 Jan 2026

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee, Bengal Distribution House, for the assessment year 2017-18 against the order dated 31.07.2025 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] passed under s

Read summary

Partha Roy vs. ITO, Ward-50(2), Kolkata

ITA No.2700/Kol/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Kolkata24 Oct 2025

The assessee, Partha Roy, an individual, did not file his return of income for the assessment year 2017-18. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee made substantial cash deposits during the demonetiz

Read summary

ITA No.2208/Bang/2024

ITA No.2208/Bang/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH: BANGALORE6 Jan 2025

The assessee, Smt. Radha Lakshmi Mannem, failed to file her income tax return within the prescribed time. Her case was selected for scrutiny to examine the source of cash deposited during the demonetization period. Despite several notices,

Read summary

M/s. Sanjay Enterprises Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Raichur

ITA No. 2026/Bang/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE29 Jan 2025

The assessee, M/s. Sanjay Enterprises, had not filed its return of income. Based on information available in the AIMS module of the ITBA, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee had deposited cash of Rs. 7,10,000/- in the savings

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning