Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–7 of 7 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
ITO vs M/s Ranyal Traders Pvt. Ltd.
The assessee company, incorporated on 06.11.1991, is engaged in trade of import-export and supply of clothing, hosiery, readymade garments, fabrics, textiles, trading and allied activities under the trade name of 'Ranyal Impex International…
Meghna Banga Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-7
A search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was conducted in the Jindal Bullion Ltd (JBL) Group on 05.01.2017. Digital data maintained in a software called Hazir Johri was seized at the residential cum busin…
Tapan Kumar Nath Vs ITO, Ward-22(2), Kolkata
The appeal by the assessee, Tapan Kumar Nath, is against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi, passed on 16.01.2024 under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee's …
ITA No. 3555/Del/2025 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18
The Revenue's appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s order reversing the assessment findings dated 22.12.2019 treating the assessee’s entire cash deposits of Rs.4.72 crores as unexplained. The assessee, e…
Saifa Molla Vs. ITO, Ward-26(3), Kolkata
The assessee, Saifa Molla, an individual, filed her return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 showing a total income of ₹2,90,590/-. Her case was selected for scrutiny to verify the source of cash deposits during the demonetization p…
Gurkripa Enterprises Vs. ITO, Ward-40(3), Kolkata
The assessee, Gurkripa Enterprises, deposited cash amounting to Rs.15,15,500/- during the demonetization period (09.11.2016 to 31.12.2016). The Assessing Officer issued notices under sections 142(1) and 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, b…
Rajib Dutta Gupta Vs. I.T.O., Ward-62(4), Kolkata
The assessee, Rajib Dutta Gupta, an individual and employee of a railway bank, filed his return of income showing a total income of ₹7,27,350/-. His case was selected for scrutiny through Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection (CASS). The Ass…