Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–19 of 19 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Puran Store vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-43(1)
The assessee, Puran Store, was issued a notice under section 148A(b) seeking explanation for cash deposits of Rs 1,58,80,000/-. The assessee furnished an explanation stating the deposits were from cash sales and matched VAT returns. The Ass…
AGF Finlease (India) Limited vs Income Tax Officer
The appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre/Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), New Delhi, dated 23.06.2025 arising out of assessment order dated 06.12.2019 passed under section 143(3) of…
M/s. Decent Securities (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
The present appeal is filed by assessee against the order dated 31.07.2025 by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in Appeal No.CIT(A), Delhi-3/10397/2019-20 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act,…
Krishan Kumar Bansal, Sh. Dinesh Kumar Bansal (Legal Heir of Late Sh. Krishan Kumar Bansal) Vs. Assessing Officer, Ward-46(4), New Delhi
This appeal by assessee is arising out of the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre/ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), New Delhi, dated 05.07.2024 against the assessment order dated 29.09.2021 passed u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, …
Shagun Dhawan vs. Addl./JCIT
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl./JCIT(A)-2, Chennai’s DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1081812663(1), dated 16.10.2025 involving proceedings under sectio…
Sh. Gopesh Mehta v. Income tax Officer, Ward-1, Narnaul
The assessee/appellant is aggrieved against the lower authorities' findings treating his cash deposits during demonetization amounting to Rs.10,23,000/- as unexplained. The assessee argued that the deposits were redeposits of cash withdrawa…
Paan Mahel Vs Income Tax Officer
The case pertains to the assessment year 2017-18. The assessee, Paan Mahel, appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirming additions made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 read with section 115BBE …
Suresh Kumar Gupta Vs. ACIT
The Assessee filed a return of income at Rs. 2,97,100/- which was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was picked up for 'complete scrutiny' under the CASS system. An assessment order was passed under section…
Gulshan Chawla Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward 59(4), New Delhi
The appellant/assessee filed an e-return of income-tax declaring a total income of Rs.5,68,839/- on 31.03.2018. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 and selected for scrutiny assessment under Section 143…
Raja Paints India Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee, Raja Paints India Private Limited, is contesting an ad-hoc addition of Rs.3,05,61,134/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of Gross Profit for Assessment Year 2017-18. A survey under section 133A was conducted on th…
MIH Internet SEA PTE Ltd. vs The Assessing Officer
The captioned appeal is filed by the Assessee, MIH Internet SEA PTE Ltd., challenging the Final Assessment Order passed under section 143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 27/04/2023 pertaining to the Assessme…
ITA No.4463/Del/2024
The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s order dated 26.07.2024. The Revenue’s grievance is based on the CIT(A)/NFAC r…
General Motors India Private Limited vs The Assessing Officer
The captioned appeal is filed by General Motors India Private Limited challenging the Final Assessment Order passed under section 143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 28/02/2022 pertaining to the Assessment Ye…
Addl. CIT Special Range Vs. Ghaziabad Ship Breakers Pvt. Ltd.
The case pertains to the assessment year 2017-18 where the Assessing Officer (AO) made additions to the income of Ghaziabad Ship Breakers Pvt. Ltd. on account of unexplained cash sales, under valuation of closing stock, and unexplained expe…
Kanta Bhatia Legal Heir of Pramod Kumar Bhatia, M/s. P.K. Steels vs. DCIT
The assessee, Kanta Bhatia, legal heir of Pramod Kumar Bhatia, M/s. P.K. Steels, underwent a search and seizure action under section 132 of the Income Tax Act on 05.10.2017. Following this, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridaba…
Harish Bansal vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 36(4), New Delhi
The assessee, Harish Bansal, filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-18 on 30.10.2017 declaring an income of Rs.8,21,830/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and a notice under section 143(2) dated 16.8.2018 was issued. Fur…
Banarasi Flour Mill vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Banarasi Flour Mill, a partnership firm, filed its return of income on 30.10.2017 declaring total income at Rs. 1,23,880/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and the assessee was asked to file certain details. Howe…
ACIT vs. Matrix Cellular (International) Services Pvt. Ltd.
The assessee/appellant electronically filed a return of income on 30.11.2017 declaring a loss of Rs.1,23,79,675/-. The case was selected for complete scrutiny under CASS. A notice under section 143(2) of the Act dated 19.09.2018 was issued,…
Kreuz Subsea Technologies Pte. Ltd. Vs. ACIT
Kreuz Subsea Technologies Pte. Ltd. filed an appeal against the final assessment order dated 26/03/2021 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle International Taxation 2(1)(2)-Delhi under Section 143(3) read with Section 1…