Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 141160 of 183 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Gitika Rani Majumder vs. Income Tax Officer

I.T.A. No.2156/Kol/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, KOLKATA19 Dec 2025

The assessee, Gitika Rani Majumder, filed a return of income for Rs. 5,52,530/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by issuing a notice under section 148 on 31.03.2021, which was served on the assessee on 0

Read summary

Durga Shaw Vs. ACIT, Circle-2

ITA No.1461/KOL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Kolkata15 Dec 2025

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee, Durga Shaw, against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, dated 04.03.2025 for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The appeal was initially barred by limitation by 37 days. However, t

Read summary

Bishal Jain vs. Income Tax Officer

I.T.A. No.1323/Kol/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC Bench, Kolkata19 Dec 2025

The assessee, Bishal Jain, filed a return of income on 30.03.2017 declaring a total income of Rs. 7,62,300/-. His case was selected for scrutiny to verify whether the cash deposited was from disclosed sources. The Assessing Officer (AO) mad

Read summary

Sri Chowdry, Gopalakrishnasetty Narayan Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2(3), Mysore

ITA No. 2418/Bang/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘SMC’ BENCH: BANGALORE28 Jan 2025

The assessee, Sri Chowdry, Gopalakrishnasetty Narayan, is an individual deriving income as a share of profit from the firm M/s Parvati Enterprises and is claimed to be engaged in the business of money lending. He filed a return of income de

Read summary

Shri. Sargod Venkatappa Gowda Subramanya vs. ITO

ITA No.2297/Bang/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Bangalore16 Jan 2025

The Income Tax Department observed that the assessee, Shri. Sargod Venkatappa Gowda Subramanya, had not filed a return of income under section 139(1) of the Act despite depositing cash in various bank accounts and undertaking purchase and s

Read summary

Sacred Trust Registered vs. ITO (Exemptions)

ITA No.1675/Bang/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘C’ BENCH: BANGALORE6 Jan 2025

The assessee, Sacred Trust Registered, a Charitable Trust owning 6 institutions, claimed deduction under section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CPC Bangalore denied the claim on the ground that the assessee’s income is abov

Read summary

Namitha Deenadayalu Naidu vs. ITO

ITA No.1572/Bang/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH: BANGALORE9 Jan 2025

The assessee, Namitha Deenadayalu Naidu, an individual and homemaker, filed her return of income for the assessment year 2016-17 declaring a total income of Rs.14,35,170/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act

Read summary

Mr. Kallappa Shadakshari Vs. The Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 108/Bang/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ Bench: Bangalore30 Jan 2025

This is an appeal filed by Mr. Kallappa Shadakshari against the order passed by the NFAC, Delhi for the assessment year 2016-17. The assessee reported interest income on loans extended to relatives and claimed bad debts corresponding to the

Read summary

Monappa S Shetty Vs. The Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 2066/Bang/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH: BANGALORE24 Jan 2025

This is an appeal filed by the assessee, Monappa S Shetty, against the order passed by the NFAC, Delhi dated 28/08/2024 for the assessment year 2016-17. During the proceedings, the Authorized Representative (AR) of the Assessee submitted th

Read summary

Miniswamappa Satish Vs. The Income Tax Officer

ITA No.2353/Bang/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Bangalore20 Jan 2025

The assessee, Miniswamappa Satish, an individual, failed to file any return of income for the assessment year 2016-17. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act based on information received. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued multi

Read summary

M/s. Meerams Overseas Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Income Tax Officer

ITA No.1975/Bang/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Bangalore6 Jan 2025

The assessee, M/s. Meerams Overseas Pvt. Ltd., sold a property on 07.02.2015 for Rs.1,25,00,000. The property was purchased on 21.06.2004 for Rs.25,97,466. The assessee claimed an indexed cost of acquisition of Rs.58,49,710 and a further co

Read summary

Magadi Planning Authority vs. The Income Tax Officer

ITA No.1056, 1352 & 1353/Bang/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Bangalore22 Jan 2025

The assessee, Magadi Planning Authority, is a town planning authority created under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961. It is responsible for the administration, development, and monitoring of affairs in rural Magadi town, lo

Read summary

ITA No.1014/Bang/2024

ITA No.1014/Bang/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH: BANGALORE13 Jan 2025

The present appeal arises from the order of the ld. CIT(A) dated 30.6.2023. There is a delay of 266 days in filing this appeal, for which the appellant has relied upon an application for condonation of delay supported by an affidavit. The r

Read summary

Irene Pereira vs. ITO, Ward–1 & TPS

ITA No. 2273/Bang/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘C’ BENCH: BANGALORE6 Jan 2025

The assessee, Irene Pereira, is a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) working as a Nurse in Kuwait Oil Company (K.O.C.) since 1996. She did not file her return of income for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The Department had information that she purchas

Read summary

The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Central Circle, Ballari Vs. M/s Abdul Maneed Engineers and Contractors

ITA No.1482/Bang/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, BANGALORE22 Jan 2025

The assessee, a partnership firm, is engaged in the business of construction and sale of units or land acquired through a joint development agreement. A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act was carried out in

Read summary

POOJA GUPTA VS. ITO, WARD 52(1), CH. 206-207, ANSAL SATYAM, NOIDA

ITA No. 5036/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘F’’ : NEW DELHI)24 Feb 2025

This appeal has been filed by the Assessee, Pooja Gupta, against the order dated 27.8.2024 passed by the NFAC, Delhi for the assessment year 2016-17. The assessee raised several grounds against the order of the Ld. Addl. /JCIT (A), includin

Read summary

ITA No. 79/Del/2024

ITA No. 79/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi21 Feb 2025

The present appeal is filed by Wizman Impex Pvt. Ltd. against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal/National Faceless Appeal Centre dated 29/11/2023 for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The Assessee filed a letter seeking to withdr

Read summary

Vibhuti Bhargava Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

ITA No.2515/DEL/2024 (A.Y.2016-17)Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'D', Delhi21 Feb 2025

This appeal by the assessee, Vibhuti Bhargava, is directed against the assessment order dated 27.03.2024 passed under sections 147 and 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment year 2016-17. The assessee is a non-resident with no sour

Read summary

Rockwell Automation India Pvt. Ltd Vs. ACIT

ITA No. 232/Del/2022INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH “I”: NEW DELHI21 Feb 2025

The appeal in ITA No.232/Del/2022 for AY 2016-17, arises out of the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’, in short] in Appeal No. ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2020-21/1032058955(1) dated 31.03

Read summary

Prabhat Adarsh Jan Kalyan Samiti v. Income-tax Officer

ITA No. 5119/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘H’ New Delhi20 Feb 2025

The assessee, Prabhat Adarsh Jan Kalyan Samiti, filed its return of income declaring ‘Nil’ income and claiming exemption under sections 11 & 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was selected for scrutiny assessment, and notices under se

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning