Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–16 of 16 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Income Tax Officer, Ward-30(5), Delhi vs. Sanjeev Aggarwal
The assessee filed his return of income for A.Y. 2015-16 declaring total income at Rs. 1,73,16,460/-. The AO reopened the assessment based on information that the assessee had sold his immovable property. The assessee filed a revised return…
Yudhishthir vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Yudhishthir, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which dismissed his appeal against the re-assessment order passed by the Assessing …
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle vs. Sterling Agro Industries Limited
The assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2015-16 declaring total income of Rs.22,91,10,290/-. The Revenue initiated proceedings u/s 147 of the Act and issued a notice u/s 148 of the Act dated 27-07-2022. The Assessing Officer comple…
Sh. Ankit Agarwal vs. Income Tax Officer, Noida
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2015-16 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082184649(1), dated …
Income Tax Officer, Ward -12(1) Vs. Vasa Commercial Pvt. ltd.
The assessee, Vasa Commercial Pvt. ltd., filed the return of income on 24.09.2015, declaring a total income of ₹78,09,700/-. The case was reopened u/s 147 of the Act by issuing a notice u/s 148 of the Act on 31.03.2021. The Assessing Office…
Hooghly Dock & Port Engineers Limited vs. DCIT, Circle(1), Kolkata
This appeal arises from an order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. The assessee, Hooghly Dock & Port Engineers Limited, f…
Vilayil Satyan Pillai vs Assessment Unit, NFAC Delhi
The assessee’s case was re-opened under section 147 and income was assessed at Rs. 43,27,44,406/- as against returned income of Rs. 6,18,583/- vide order dated 29.05.2023 passed under section 147 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act…
Niripraj Singh Sohal vs ITO Ward
The assessee, Niripraj Singh Sohal, did not file his return for the Assessment Year 2015-16 despite having salary income, interest income, and other transactions reflected on the Insight portal of the department. Consequently, the Assessing…
Innus Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT
The present appeal is filed by Innus Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. against the order dated 05.06.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. The assessee has challenged the appellate or…
ITA No. 234/Del/2025 CO 228/Del/2025 Ashutosh Foods (AY: 2015-16)
The assessee, Ashutosh Foods, filed a return of income on 01.10.2015 declaring income at Rs.56,95,570/- for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessment order was passed on 29.12.2017 at the same income. Subsequently, a notice u/s 148 was is…
Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited vs. Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi
The appeal was filed by Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited against the order dated 31/03/2025 passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee challenged the reopen…
Chhanda Kar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-27(3), Haldia
Chhanda Kar, a retailer of SARI and other ladies' garments, was assessed to tax under the jurisdiction of the Income Tax Officer, Ward 27(3), Haldia. The assessment year 2015-16 was completed and an order was passed under sections 147, 144,…
Kakoli Debanshi Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1)
The assessee, Kakoli Debanshi, is a non-filer of return. However, records indicate that she entered into a transaction involving the transfer of capital assets worth ₹40,00,000 and deposited cash amounting to ₹20,34,000 during the year. Con…
Karambir Singh Vs The Income-tax Officer
The assessee, Karambir Singh, filed his Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2015-16 declaring an income of Rs. 16,83,120/-. The return was selected for scrutiny assessment and the assessment under section 143(3) was completed on the re…
ADIL vs. ITO
The assessee, Shri Adil, an individual, never filed his return of income. The Assessing Officer (AO) had information that the assessee purchased an immovable property for Rs. 1,02,33,500/- and paid stamp duty of Rs. 4,87,500/- jointly with …
Devindra Singh vs. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee, Devindra Singh, an ex-serviceman, had cash deposits of Rs. 26,20,000 in his State Bank of India account during Financial Year 2014-15. The Department issued a notice under section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act on 30.03.2022, a…