Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 23 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Manzar Hossain Khan Vs. ACIT, Circle-25, Kolkata
The assessee, Manzar Hossain Khan, filed his return of income for AY 2015-16 declaring a total income of Rs. 22,65,490/-. His case was selected for limited scrutiny due to a substantial increase in capital compared to the previous year. The…
Shatakshi Mudra Investment Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Ward-5(1), Kolkata
This is an appeal filed by Shatakshi Mudra Investment Pvt. Ltd. against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, passed on 06.11.2024 under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, …
Hooghly Dock & Port Engineers Limited vs. DCIT, Circle(1), Kolkata
This appeal arises from an order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. The assessee, Hooghly Dock & Port Engineers Limited, f…
Jalpaiguri Zilla Regulated Marketing Committee vs. ITO, Jalpaiguri
The assessee, Jalpaiguri Zilla Regulated Marketing Committee, did not file its income returns for the assessment year 2015-16. The Assessing Officer received information about huge cash deposits of Rs. 1,91,12,639 made by the assessee but n…
Gunmala Devi Jain vs. DCIT, Circle-29, Kolkata
The assessee, Gunmala Devi Jain, filed her return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 declaring a total income of Rs. 23,35,690/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS, and the assessment was completed under section 1…
APE Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-7(1)
The assessee, APE Power Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 29.09.2015, declaring a total income of ₹49,24,210. The case was selected for scrutiny under Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection (CASS), and a notice under section 143(2) of …
Subodh Adhikary vs. ITO Ward 51(1), Kolkata
The case pertains to the appeal filed by Subodh Adhikary against the order dated 05.10.2021 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. The assessee filed a condonation petition due…
Ritu Patwari vs. DCIT, CC-4(4), Kolkata
During the assessment year 2015-16, the assessee, Ritu Patwari, was involved in share trading and filed her return of income on 07.09.2015 declaring a total income of Rs.6,47,970/-. The case was selected for scrutiny due to suspicious sale …
Manorama Patwa vs. ITO, Ward-47(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Manorama Patwa, filed a return of income declaring a total income of Rs.23,34,930/- for the assessment year 2015-16. A notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act was issued on 01.04.2021, and the Assessing Officer complete…
M. A Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-4(1), Kolkata
The assessee, M. A Financial Services Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 declaring a total income of Rs.9,647. The return was processed, and later a notice under section 148A(b) was issued based on informa…
Chhanda Kar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-27(3), Haldia
Chhanda Kar, a retailer of SARI and other ladies' garments, was assessed to tax under the jurisdiction of the Income Tax Officer, Ward 27(3), Haldia. The assessment year 2015-16 was completed and an order was passed under sections 147, 144,…
Bangamata Tie-up Private Limited Vs. ITO 13(1)
The case of the assessee, Bangamata Tie-up Private Limited, was reopened upon credible information regarding suspicious transactions in the bank account maintained with ICICI Bank Ltd. The assessee had received an amount of Rs. 2,17,50,000/…
Anupama Vintrade Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-10(2), Kolkata
The assessee, Anupama Vintrade Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 declaring a total income of Rs.23,32,310/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. Later, based on informatio…
Kiran Agarwal vs. ITO, Ward -28(4), Kolkata
The assessee, Kiran Agarwal, filed its original return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 on 28.08.2015 declaring a total income of Rs.5,66,650/-. The case was selected for scrutiny as per CASS. During the relevant assessment year, t…
Kakoli Debanshi Vs. ITO, Ward 3(1)
The assessee, Kakoli Debanshi, is a non-filer of return. However, records indicate that she entered into a transaction involving the transfer of capital assets worth ₹40,00,000 and deposited cash amounting to ₹20,34,000 during the year. Con…
Hilton Dealmark Private Limited vs. Circle 7(1), Kolkata
This appeal arises from an order under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 06.03.2025, passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. The Assessing Officer (AO) had pass…
Guiness Finance & Leasing Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-6(2), Kolkata
The assessee company, Guiness Finance & Leasing Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 declaring total income of Rs. Nil. The return was selected for scrutiny due to the assessee being a beneficiary of credit …
Roy Banerjee Development Private Limited vs. ITO Ward 1(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Roy Banerjee Development Private Limited, filed a return of income on 08.01.2016, declaring a total loss of ₹89,590/-. The case was reopened under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, after the Assessing Officer received i…
Lakshmi Sadho Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO, Ward-10(2), Kolkata
During the assessment proceedings, it was noticed that the assessee, Lakshmi Sadho Commercial Pvt. Ltd., had shown a property valued at ₹1,35,95,500, whereas the fair market value was determined at ₹1,47,77,500 for the purpose of stamp duty…
Debashis Das vs. ACIT, International Taxation-1(1), Kolkata
The assessee, Debashis Das, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 declaring total income of ₹86,82,640 and claiming a refund of ₹13,310. Subsequently, a revised return was filed declaring total income of ₹86,90,530 and clai…