Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 111 of 11 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

M/s.Ashiana Manufacturing India Ltd vs. DCIT

ITA No. 2998/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench25 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

The appeal arises out of the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 07.05.2024 against the order of assessment passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 26.05.2023 by the Assessing Officer, NeF

Read summary

Sai Expo Fab Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT Circle-22(2)

ITA No. 5998/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘G’, New Delhi18 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

The assessee company filed its return for A.Y. 2014-15 on 26.11.2014 declaring total income of Rs. 26,11,290/-. Subsequently, on the basis of information available on the Insight portal regarding bogus transactions made by the assessee, the

Read summary

Dharambir v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi

ITA No.4860/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench17 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

The assessee, Dharambir, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC dated 25.02.2025 for A.Y. 2014-15. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, including procedural irregularities, invalid n

Read summary

Rajiv Garg vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

ITA No.7804/DEL/2025 (A.Y.2014-15)Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench16 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 18.09.2025 for Assessment Year 2014-15. The assessee declared income of Rs.9,76,450/- for A.Y. 2014-15. Reassessment proceedings were initiated, an

Read summary

Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(4), Hapur, Uttar Pradesh Vs. Sh. Manoj Kumar Singhal

ITA No.206/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI26 Mar 2025

The case pertains to the assessment year 2014-15, where the Assessing Officer added Rs. 1,84,94,100/- to the assessee's income as unexplained cash credits under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This addition was based on information

Read summary

Hansraj Vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No:- 4978/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH: ‘C’: NEW DELHI)30 Jan 2026

In this case, the assessee, Hansraj, had not filed his return of income for the assessment year 2014-15. The Department found that the assessee had deposited a large sum of cash in his bank account during the financial year 2013-14. The Ass

Read summary

Neptune Fincot Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, Circle-15(1)(2), Mumbai

ITA No. 3946/MUM/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'B' BENCH, MUMBAI6 Jan 2026

This appeal by Neptune Fincot Pvt. Ltd. is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dated 09.07.2024 for A.Y. 2014-15. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, primarily challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings un

Read summary

Narendra Sevantilal (HUF) Vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No.5233/M/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench12 Jan 2026

The case involves an appeal by Narendra Sevantilal (HUF) against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)/Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the Assessment Year 2014-15. The Assessee had made an investment of

Read summary

Tigerhill Tradelink Private Limited Vs. ITO, Ward-10(2), Kolkata

I.T.A. Nos.: 955 & 956/KOL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata ‘D’ Bench3 Oct 2025

The assessee company, Tigerhill Tradelink Private Limited, filed its return of income for A.Y. 2014-15 declaring a loss of Rs. 13,346/-. However, information received from DDIT (Inv.) indicated that the assessee had received Rs. 2,31,00,000

Read summary

Sarita Goenka vs. Income Tax Officer

I.T.A. No.2157/Kol/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, KOLKATA19 Dec 2025

The assessee, Sarita Goenka, did not file any return of income for the assessment year 2014-15. The Investigation Wing of the Income Tax Department found that a racket involving accommodation entries in the form of Long Term Capital Gains/S

Read summary

Shri. Vinod Kumar Singhal Vs. PR.CIT

ITA No.1004/Bang/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Bangalore20 Jan 2025

This appeal was filed by the assessee, Shri. Vinod Kumar Singhal, against the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PR.CIT) under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The PR.CIT had set aside the reassessment order p

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning