Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 21–40 of 97 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Narender Singh Malik Vs Income Tax Officer
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2014-15 arises against the C IT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1072972601(1) dated 06.02.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was …
Sankalp Society vs Income Tax Officer(E)
The assessee’s twin appeals for Assessment Years 2014-15 and 2018-19 arise against the Ad dl./JCIT(A)-1, Ahmedabad’s DIN & order No. IT BA/AP L/S/250/2025-26/1084344501(1) & 1084344609(1) dated 02.01.2026, in proceedings u/s 143(1) of the I…
ITO, Ward -20(1) Vs. Prem Softech Private Ltd.
The assessee, Prem Softech Private Ltd., was subjected to a reopened assessment for AY 2014-15 under sections 147, 144, and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee had undisclosed interest income…
M/s Singla Realters Ltd Vs. The I.T.O
The assessee, M/s Singla Realters Ltd, was engaged in the business of real estate and construction. The company claimed expenses towards purchase of construction material and travelling, which were partially disallowed by the Assessing Offi…
M/s. Bhasin Motors Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT
The assessee, M/s. Bhasin Motors Pvt. Ltd., filed twin appeals against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-23's order dated 11.01.2019. The appeals pertain to proceedings under section 143(3) and 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. …
Braham Dutt Vashist vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Gurgaon-122001
The assessee received interest of Rs. 3,97,56,460/- on enhanced compensation from HUDA after the compulsory acquisition of his agricultural land. The assessee claimed the said interest as exempt under Section 10(37) of the Income Tax Act, 1…
Krishan Pal vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Gurgaon, Haryana
The assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2014-15 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi's order dated 27.08.2024, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee raised additional grounds challenging the jurisdic…
DCIT, Central Circle 28, New Delhi vs. Gunjan Gupta, BJ-128, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi – 110 088.
This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] dated 25.07.2025 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. Search action wa…
Airports Authority of India Employees Provident Fund Trust vs The Income Tax Department
The assessee, Airports Authority of India Employees Provident Fund Trust, is an approved Provident Fund Trust under Rule 3(1) of part A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee claimed a sum of Rs. 1,14,70,598/- as exempt income under Sect…
Balesh Jain & Sons HUF vs. Income -Tax Officer Ward 55
The case of the assessee was re-opened for A.Y. 2014-15 u/s 147 of the Act and notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued dated 29-06-2022. In the response of the notice the assessee filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs.10,80,4…
Nusrat Banka vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-61(1), Delhi-110001
The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2014-15 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1076190365(1) dated 14.05.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was ca…
Blaze Manufacturing Co vs DCIT
The assessee, Blaze Manufacturing Co, engaged in the business of export of Indian handicrafts, filed its return of income declaring a total income of INR 92,29,680/-. The assessment was completed with a total income of INR 93,74,390/- by ma…
M/s Kay Cee Enterprises MEK vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
The appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-20, New Delhi, dated 23.10.2017, arising out of the assessment order dated 30.12.2016 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Joint…
Dinesh Kumar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The appeal was filed by Dinesh Kumar against the order dated 21.10.2024 of the Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-24, Delhi, under Section 250 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2014-15. The appellant/assessee had…
Stupa Consulting Private Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The appeal was filed by Stupa Consulting Private Ltd. against the order dated 29.08.2024 of the Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, arising out of the order dated 26.12.2016 of the Lea…
ITA No.1332/Del/2020
This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2014-15, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-37 [in short, the 'CIT(A)'], New Delhi’s order dated 17.01.2020 passed in case no. CIT(A), Delhi-37/10010/2016-17, involving proceedi…
Late Arvind Kumar Kotawal vs ACIT, Circle 70(1), New Delhi
The return of income for A.Y. 2014-15 was filed by the assessee / appellant on 14.07.2014, declaring total income at Rs. 38,26,220/-. The assessee was selected for scrutiny and an initial notice u/s 143(2) dated 21.09.2015 was issued and se…
Chitra Utsav Video Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO
The case pertains to the assessment year 2014-15, where Chitra Utsav Video Pvt. Ltd filed its return of income on 26-11-2014 declaring a total income of Rs 19,01,202/-. The company's predominant business activities were film production and …
Prahlad Gautam vs. Dy. CIT
The instant appeal was filed by the assessee, Sh. Prahlad Gautam, against the order dated 23/08/2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), arising out of the assessment order passed unde…
Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(4), Hapur, Uttar Pradesh Vs. Sh. Manoj Kumar Singhal
The case pertains to the assessment year 2014-15, where the Assessing Officer added Rs. 1,84,94,100/- to the assessee's income as unexplained cash credits under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This addition was based on information…