Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 17 of 7 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Shri Narender Singh Vs The I.T.O

ITA No. 4099/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi 'G' Bench4 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The AO received information that the assessee made cash deposits amounting to Rs.52,30,000/- in a State Bank of India account. The AO found that the assessee did not file any ITR for A.Y. 2012-13 and did not offer any explanation regarding

Read summary

Sushmita Gupta vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 3741/DEL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘G’19 Mar 2025

In this case, the assessment was completed under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Assessing Officer (AO) vide order dated 05.12.2019. The AO made an addition under section 69A of Rs.93,10,000/- for unexplained investment in pr

Read summary

AZAD SINGH VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(1), SAHARANPUR UP

ITA NO. 3740/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH “SMC”, NEW DELHI10 Mar 2025

The assessee, Azad Singh, did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2012-13. During the year, he made cash deposits totaling Rs. 27,45,500/- into his savings bank account at Punjab National Bank, Saharanpur. Based on these dep

Read summary

CHETNA SUNDARAM VS. DCIT, CIRCLE 70(1), NEW DELHI

ITA NO. 2512/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH10 Mar 2025

The assessee, Chetna Sundaram, deposited Rs. 2,00,000 in her HDFC Bank Ltd. savings account. The source of this deposit remained unexplained despite being given ample opportunity to provide documentation. Consequently, this amount was deeme

Read summary

Mr. Dhiren Pradip Sadiwala Vs. ITO, Ward-23(1)(6)

I.T.A. No.5551/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), 'SMC' Bench, Mumbai21 Jan 2026

The assessee, Mr. Dhiren Pradip Sadiwala, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2012-13 declaring a total income of Rs. 7,55,020/-. A search and seizure action under section 132 of the Income Tax Act was carried out in the case

Read summary

Shri. Sandeep Vimalchand Gadiya Vs. ITO

ITA No.2404/Bang/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Bangalore31 Jan 2025

The facts of the case are that there was a substantial cash deposit in the Financial Year 2011-12 in the assessee’s bank account, and the assessee did not file a return of income. A notice under section 148 of the Act was issued, and severa

Read summary

RAJESH JAIN VS. ITO, WARD 34(6)

ITA No. 4/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’: NEW DELHI)19 Feb 2025

The assessee, Rajesh Jain, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2012-13 declaring a total income of Rs. 1,60,260/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that during the financial year 2011-12, the assessee made cash deposits of Rs

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning