Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–17 of 17 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
M/s Shring Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT/DCIT, Circle-2, Muzaffarnagar
The assessee’s twin appeals ITA Nos. 5226/Del/2016 & ITA No. 7057/Del/2018 for Assessment Year 2012-13 arise against the CIT(A), Muzaffarnagar’s orders dated 29.07.2016 & 26.09.2018 in case Nos. 39/15-16/MZR & 4003-3 815-1170-218, in procee…
Ojas Impex Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer-19(1)
The assessee, Ojas Impex Private Limited, received Rs.50 lakhs from M/s Divyadrishti Merchants Pvt. Ltd., which was treated as unexplained income and added back under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer received in…
Techno Teaching Infosolution Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-1(2), Kolkata
The assessee, Techno Teaching Infosolution Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 declaring total income at Nil and subsequently filed a revised return also declaring total income at Nil. The case was selected for…
Trimline Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward-10(2), Kolkata
The assessee, Trimline Agencies Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for AY 2012-13 declaring total income at Rs. 11,560/- and deemed total income u/s 115JB at Rs. 7,989/-. The return was processed, and the case was reopened with a notice …
Jugal Kishor Pradhan vs ITO
The assessee, Jugal Kishor Pradhan, is in the business of trading iron and steel scrap. He filed his original return of income on 27/08/2012 and subsequently filed a return of income on receipt of notice u/s 148 of the Act declaring a total…
Munish Kumar Verma Vs. The I.T.O
The assessee, Munish Kumar Verma, is an individual engaged in share trading and investing activities. He filed his Return of Income on 29.09.2012 declaring NIL income and claimed Rs 82,21,809/- as loss. The return was selected for scrutiny …
Sanjay vs. ITO, Ward-2
The assessee, Sanjay, deposited cash of Rs. 28,50,000/- in his bank account maintained with Corporation Bank, Rohtak during the Assessment Year 2012-13. Since the assessee failed to file the return of income under section 139(1), he was req…
National Steels Vs. ITO, Ward-46(1), Delhi
The case involves National Steels, a partnership firm with PAN AAAFN2899Q, which claims to have dissolved in 2002 and converted into a proprietary concern owned by Shri Kishan Lakhani. No return of income was filed for the assessment year 2…
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle -31, New Delhi. Vs. M/s SRC Realtech Pvt. Ltd., M/s Pyramid Buildtech Pvt. Ltd., M/s SRC Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
The case involves three companies: M/s SRC Buildtech Pvt. Ltd, SRC Realtech Pvt. Ltd, and Pyramid Buildtech Pvt. Ltd, all belonging to the SRC group. A search and seizure action under Section 132 was conducted on 14.09.2017 at various busin…
Bholenath Foods Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Bholenath Foods Limited, is a private limited company engaged in trading food grains. It filed its Income Tax Return (ITR) for Assessment Year 2012-13 declaring an income of Rs.1,31,83,635/-. The case was selected for scrutiny…
M/s. Sapphire Fintech Private Limited v/s Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The assessee, M/s. Sapphire Fintech Private Limited, is engaged in the business of investment. For the assessment year 2012-13, the assessee filed its return of income declaring a total loss. During the scrutiny assessment, it was observed …
Reachasia vs. DCIT/ACIT, Circle-29, Kolkata
The assessee, Reachasia, filed a return of income on 30.09.2012 declaring a total income of Rs.20,52,420/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and the assessment was framed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on 28.03.2014, a…
Income Tax Officer, Ward 9(1) Vs. SGS Fashion Private Limited
The assessee, SGS Fashion Private Limited, filed its return of income on 30.09.2012, declaring a total income of ₹12,71,540/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS due to a large share premium. The assessee provided details of shar…
ACIT, Central Circle-1(2), Kolkata Vs. Somani Services Private Limited
The assessee, Somani Services Private Limited, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2013-14 showing 'NIL' income. Subsequently, a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act was issued, prompting the assessee to file a revi…
Umang Webtech Private Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Umang Webtech Private Limited, filed its return of income on 30.09.2012, declaring a total income of ₹5,43,834/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 on 28.03.2019, which th…
Sunil Gupta vs. ACIT
The assessee, Sunil Gupta, filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2012-13 on 02.02.2013 declaring a total income of Rs. 3,41,980/-. A search and seizure action under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was carried out on 13.…
The ACIT, Circle -7(1), New Delhi Vs M/s. Dayal Steel P. Ltd.
The case pertains to the assessment year 2012-13 where M/s. Dayal Steel P. Ltd. filed a return declaring an income of Rs. 11,28,235/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS. During the year, the assessee received unsecured loans amo…